2020
DOI: 10.1109/jsac.2019.2951970
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Storage or No Storage: Duopoly Competition Between Renewable Energy Suppliers in a Local Energy Market

Abstract: Renewable energy generations and energy storage are playing increasingly important roles in serving consumers in power systems. This paper studies the market competition between renewable energy suppliers with or without energy storage in a local energy market. The storage investment brings the benefits of stabilizing renewable energy suppliers' outputs, but it also leads to substantial investment costs as well as some surprising changes in the market outcome. To study the equilibrium decisions of storage inve… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(98 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, they neglect another possible transaction mode, that is, RESs suppliers also can trade directly with surrounding consumers without the intervention of others. For example, Zhao et al [16] propose a three-stage game model for RESs suppliers and local consumers, which considers the impact of investment costs for energy storage when RESs suppliers sell RESs energy. Paudel et al [17] design an M-leader and N-follower Stackelberg game approach to study the energy trading between RESs suppliers and surrounding consumers in a small community microgrid.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, they neglect another possible transaction mode, that is, RESs suppliers also can trade directly with surrounding consumers without the intervention of others. For example, Zhao et al [16] propose a three-stage game model for RESs suppliers and local consumers, which considers the impact of investment costs for energy storage when RESs suppliers sell RESs energy. Paudel et al [17] design an M-leader and N-follower Stackelberg game approach to study the energy trading between RESs suppliers and surrounding consumers in a small community microgrid.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Zhao et al . [16] propose a three‐stage game model for RESs suppliers and local consumers, which considers the impact of investment costs for energy storage when RESs suppliers sell RESs energy. Paudel et al .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed market model consists of two stages, the inner transaction between DGs and FLs, and transferring of the residual/lacking power to/from the utility grid. The market design proposed in this paper applies the central-matching strategy from the Uber business model and the multiattribute pricing strategy from the Airbnb model [7,8]. The matching strategy of the distribution-level market is to find the point where participants in the existence of distribution-level market could gain the largest profit compared to the case without the distribution-level market.…”
Section: Market Mathematical Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It focuses on whether fair payments are offered to flexible generators under the current electricity market design. References [5][6][7][8][9][10][11]are evaluations of flexibility value. The first three of those papers analyse flexibilities offered by specific technologies, while the remaining target at value from multi-resourced flexibilities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the fact that the charging infrastructure (including charging towers) are ground-mounted and AC-powered, the infrastructure gathers energy/power sources without strict limitations. Furthermore, the charging towers can (i) share their own energy resources in order to provide reliable and efficient energy resources among them or (ii) purchase energy resources from their associated utility company (also known as external local energy market) [18][19][20][21][22]. The dynamic active energy sharing sequential decision control process is essentially required for this given problem because the energy/power prices are determined based on auction-based economic theory in the local energy market [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%