Storage‐dependent drainable porosity for complex hillslopes

Abstract

[1] In hydraulic groundwater theory the parameter drainable porosity f (a storage coefficient that accounts for the effect of the unsaturated zone on water table dynamics) is usually treated as a constant. For shallow unconfined aquifers the value of this parameter, however, depends on the depth to the water table and the water retention characteristics of the soil. In this study an analytical expression for f as a function of water table depth is derived under the assumption of quasi-steady state hydraulic equilibrium, in this way accounting, in part, for the effects of the unsaturated zone on groundwater dynamics. The derived expression is implemented in the nonlinear hillslope-storage Boussinesq (HSB) model to simulate the drainage response of complex hillslopes. The model's behavior is analyzed by comparison to (1) the HSB model with a constant value for f and (2) measurements of water tables and outflow hydrographs on a 6.0 Â 2.5 Â 0.5 m laboratory hillslope experiment. The comparison is conducted for a pure drainage case on two different hillslope shapes (linearly convergent and divergent) and for three different slope inclinations (5%, 10%, and 15%). Comparison 1 is run in an uncalibrated and a fully calibrated mode, and it enables us to evaluate the effect of a dynamic, state-dependent value for f on model output. Comparison 2 allows us to test the HSB model on several hillslope configurations and to analyze whether the concept of a storage-dependent f enhances the model performance. The comparison of the HSB models to the measurements from the laboratory hillslopes shows that it is possible to capture the general features of the outflow hydrograph during a drainage experiment using either one of the HSB models. Overall, the original (constant f) HSB model, with one fitting parameter more than the revised HSB model, shows a slightly better fit on the hydrographs when compared to the revised (variable f) HSB model. However, the peak outflow values (the first few minutes after initiation of the experiments) are better captured by the revised HSB model. The revised HSB model's performance in simulating water table movements is much more accurate than that of the original HSB model. The improved match of the revised HSB model to piezometric measurements is worth stressing because the ability to model water tables is a key attribute of the model, making it possible to investigate phenomena such as saturation excess runoff. Also noteworthy is the good match between the revised HSB model and the outflow measurements, without any calibration, for the divergent slopes. The changing values of the calibrated drainable porosity parameter for the original HSB model as different configurations are simulated (slope angle, plan shape, initial conditions), together with the ability of the revised HSB model to more accurately simulate water table dynamics, clearly demonstrates the importance of regarding drainable porosity as a dynamic, storage-dependent parameter.Citation: Hilberts, A. G. J., P. A. Troch, and C. Panicon...

Quantification of the seasonal hillslope water storage that does not drive streamflow

“…This is consistent with the hypothesis that indirect storage may equal the constant volume of nondraining storage held below an effective field capacity in the mélange matrix, whereas direct storage equals the volume of freely draining water above field capacity. Hydraulic groundwater models account for these effects with a “drainable porosity” or “specific yield” parameter, recognizing that residual pore water remains stored under tension in unsaturated media as a water table recedes (e.g., Hilberts, Troch, & Paniconi, ). We stress that this hypothesis does not necessarily imply a true physical separation or lack of mixing between direct and indirect storage domains; only that the volume of the indirect pool is not increasing or decreasing as the water table rises and recedes.…”

HESS Opinions: From response units to functional units: a thermodynamic reinterpretation of the HRU concept to link spatial organization and functioning of intermediate scale catchments

“…The HSB model is tailored for hilly landscapes with shallow, permeable, weakly heterogeneous soils, where subsurface storm flow and saturated excess overland flow dominate runoff generation (Hilberts et al, , 2005Troch et al, 2004;Berne et al, 2005). Although treatment of hillslope scale spatial variability of infiltration is a challenge, this concept is valuable in the sense that rainfall-runoff transformation is dominated by lateral fluxes of free non-capillary water and a simplified but unbiased treatment of this process.…”

Comparison of Two Nonlinear Radiation Models for Agricultural Subsurface Drainage

“… , which, in a shallow unconfined aquifer is a function of the hydraulic head (Hilberts et al, 2005;Fuentes et al, 2009).…”