1955
DOI: 10.1149/1.2429911
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Storage Batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1961
1961
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interested reader is referred to a number of texts that cover lead-acid battery technology. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Much of the recent literature addresses the twin goals of developing lead dioxide coatings that allow high current densities and efficiencies for particular electrode reactions and enhanced stability of the coating. Long term stability is always a critical issue when lead dioxide anodes are considered because corrosion of the coating must lead to contamination of the product/effluent with toxic lead(II).…”
Section: Derek Pletchermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interested reader is referred to a number of texts that cover lead-acid battery technology. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Much of the recent literature addresses the twin goals of developing lead dioxide coatings that allow high current densities and efficiencies for particular electrode reactions and enhanced stability of the coating. Long term stability is always a critical issue when lead dioxide anodes are considered because corrosion of the coating must lead to contamination of the product/effluent with toxic lead(II).…”
Section: Derek Pletchermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the surface area of the Ball mill lead oxide is considerably larger than the lead oxide obtained from the Barton Pot process [1][2][3][4]. These differences can be seen in Table 2 for the 14 samples considered in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…However, the commercial b-PbO had a very 4 Quantitative PXRD of the acid reaction product from commercial b-PbO that gave an acid reactivity of 100.9 mg g -1 oxide (LT method) small surface area when compared to the other two oxide types. These variations in surface area of the different oxides could be explained by the difference in particle size and by the manufacturing processes, where the Ball mill process produces a finer flatter plate like particle when compared to the Barton Pot oxide [1]. The normalized particle size distributions of the three lead oxide types are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations