2005
DOI: 10.1080/13803390490918507
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Storage and Access Procedures in Schizophrenia: Evidence for a Two Phase Model of Lexical Impairment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This robust finding supports the notion that lexical semantics is a generalized deficit in schizophrenia (Leeson et al, 2006) and that both action and object name retrieval can be similarly impaired (Woods et al, 2007). Furthermore, the result is in line with findings from studies that have examined visual confrontation naming abilities of schizophrenic individuals compared to controls on object picture naming tasks (Barr et al, 1989;Gabrovska et al, 2003;Laws et al, 2000;Leeson et al, 2006;Leeson et al, 2005) including the Boston Naming Test (Barr et al, 1989;Berenbaum et al, 2008;Vogel et al, 2009). When action and object naming accuracy performances were compared within the schizophrenic group, participants with SCZ showed a grammatical class effect, with action names significantly more difficult to retrieve than object names.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This robust finding supports the notion that lexical semantics is a generalized deficit in schizophrenia (Leeson et al, 2006) and that both action and object name retrieval can be similarly impaired (Woods et al, 2007). Furthermore, the result is in line with findings from studies that have examined visual confrontation naming abilities of schizophrenic individuals compared to controls on object picture naming tasks (Barr et al, 1989;Gabrovska et al, 2003;Laws et al, 2000;Leeson et al, 2006;Leeson et al, 2005) including the Boston Naming Test (Barr et al, 1989;Berenbaum et al, 2008;Vogel et al, 2009). When action and object naming accuracy performances were compared within the schizophrenic group, participants with SCZ showed a grammatical class effect, with action names significantly more difficult to retrieve than object names.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In contrast, nonsemantic or otherwise lexical access impairments in SCZ can include difficulties accessing the target response from among several competing sources of information or problems with strategic search and retrieval (Elvevag, Weinstock, Akil, Kleinman, & Goldberg, 2001). Further, nonlinguistic processes may be impaired in SCZ such as working memory and attention (Braff, 1993;Gold, Carpenter, Randolph, Goldberg, & Weinberger, 1997 Word retrieval breakdown in schizophrenia has been assessed using a variety of tasks including tests of semantic association (Bozikas et al, 2005) and word generation, including category-based (Bokat & Goldberg, 2003;Kubota et al, 2005), letter-based (Berenbaum et al, 2008;Kubota et al, 2005;Woods, Weinborn, Posada, & O'Grady, 2007) verb (action;Marvel, Schwartz, & Isaacs, 2004;Woods et al, 2007), noun (animal;Berenbaum et al, 2008;Woods et al, 2007) fluency tasks and object picture naming tasks (Barr, Bilder, Goldberg, Kaplan, & Mukherjee, 1989;Berenbaum et al, 2008;Laws et al, 2000;Leeson et al, 2006;Leeson, McKenna, & Laws, 2005;Vogel et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some researchers have proposed that semantic processing abnormalities in schizophrenia could be caused by abnormal organization of concepts within the semantic network (Aloia et al, 1996;Leeson et al, 2005;Rossell and David, 2006). This disorganized storage could exist instead of, or along with, deficient access to semantic memory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, in terms of semantic dysfunction, Spitzer (1997) constructed a theory wherein TD was proposed to stem from difficulties in the automatic access of lexical-semantic information. Yet, there has been evidence to suggest that degraded semantic storage may also play a role in TD (Leeson et al, 2005a;Rossell and David, 2006). Another proposal was that there is disorganisation within the semantic system, which may better account for residual deficits after the remission of TD (Leeson et al, 2005b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%