2008
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2008.796.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Storability and Fruit Quality of 'Braeburn' Apples as Affected by Harvest Date, 1-MCP Treatment and Different Storage Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
10
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…3c). The increased BBD incidence with 1-MCP treatment is similar to the results reported by Lafer (2008) on cv. Braeburn apples.…”
Section: -Mcp Effectssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3c). The increased BBD incidence with 1-MCP treatment is similar to the results reported by Lafer (2008) on cv. Braeburn apples.…”
Section: -Mcp Effectssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The postharvest application of the ethylene action inhibitor, 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) is often used to preserve fruit firmness and total acid content (DeEll et al 2003). Lafer (2008) showed that 1-MCP treated cv. Braeburn apples had an increased incidence of browning compared to the untreated group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A noteworthy fact is that the fruits stored under ULO and DCA-CF did not show difference. Previously researchers also found a higher flesh firmness in apples stored under DCA-CF in relation to CA (Lafer, 2008;Watkins, 2008;Zanella, Cazzanelli, & Rossi, 2008). This result is also confirmed in 2013, where fruits stored under ULO and ILOs + ULO showed the highest flesh firmness, differing from CA fruits.…”
Section: Treatmentssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…In addition, fungal decay did not vary much between harvesting dates when early to medium-early picked fruit of the same cultivar was compared (Tahir and Nybom, 2013). Similarly, natural fungal decay remained stable from 2 weeks before optimal picking date (OPD) to OPD (Lafer, 2006).…”
Section: Tolerance To Storage Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Assessment of relative levels of resistance must, however, be carried out on fruit in a similar physiological stage. A number of more or less labor-intensive methods for determination of maturation stage and storage potential in apple have been used, including the quick and simple starch test (Fallik et al, 2003;Jemric et al, 2006;Lafer, 2006;Villatoro et al, 2009;Llorente et al, 2012). In a previous study of storage potential in Swedish apple cultivars, correlations between starch value and internal ethylene content (IEC) were significant and of the same magnitude as the correlation between firmness and IEC, whereas both SSC and Streif index was less strongly correlated with IEC (Tahir and Nybom, 2013).…”
Section: Tolerance To Storage Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%