1979
DOI: 10.1086/202371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stone Tools, Toolkits, and Human Behavior in Prehistory [and Comments and Reply]

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0
11

Year Published

1982
1982
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
59
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…They are also regarded as a significant trait of behavioral modernity for Southeast Asia and the western Pacific region ( Barton et al 2009). However, hafting traces are easily overlooked or neglected in microwear analysis (Cahen et al 1979;keeley 1982). This analysis of relatively simple flakes from the Philippine Upper Palaeolithic showed that some were actually hafted armatures and parts of more complex composite tools.…”
Section: Detecting Modern Traits With Microwear Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are also regarded as a significant trait of behavioral modernity for Southeast Asia and the western Pacific region ( Barton et al 2009). However, hafting traces are easily overlooked or neglected in microwear analysis (Cahen et al 1979;keeley 1982). This analysis of relatively simple flakes from the Philippine Upper Palaeolithic showed that some were actually hafted armatures and parts of more complex composite tools.…”
Section: Detecting Modern Traits With Microwear Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the vertical and horizontal separation of conjoining objects has contributed to understandings of depositional and post-depositional processes, especially assessments of stratigraphic integrity (e.g. Bollong 1994;Cahen 1978;Cahen et al 1979;Cahen and Moyersons 1977;Villa 1982). It is this last application that is of central concern here.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This level is encountered between 80-100 cm below the surface and was still continuing with no visible change in composition excavation, a methodology was required that would not only provide a general overview of the entire collection but also enable detailed analyses to be undertaken on select groups of artifacts. The chaîne opératoire approach was chosen as it has proven to be highly successful on other sites containing assemblages where a specific set of questions were posed (e.g., Bergman et al 1990;Bodu et al 1987;Cahen and Keeley 1980;Cahen et al 1979;Coulson 1986;Edmonds 1990;Skar and Coulson 1986). Although the chaîne opératoire is commonly used as a methodological approach for analyzing collections from European Stone Age sites, elements of this method have only recently been implemented in Southern Africa (e.g., Lombard 2005Lombard , 2006cLombard et al 2004;Van Peer and Wurz 2006;Villa et al 2005;Wurz 1999Wurz , 2000Wurz , 2005Wurz et al 2005).…”
Section: Methodology-the Chaîne Opératoirementioning
confidence: 99%