2006
DOI: 10.26530/oapen_458881
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coastal Themes: An Archaeology of the Southern Curtis Coast, Queensland : An Archaeology of the Southern Curtis Coast, Queensland

Abstract: terra australis 24Terra Australis reports the results of archaeological and related research within the south and east of Asia, though mainly Australia, New Guinea and island Melanesia -lands that remained terra australis incognita to generations of prehistorians. Its subject is the settlement of the diverse environments in this isolated quarter of the globe by peoples who have maintained their discrete and traditional ways of life into the recent recorded or remembered past and at times into the observable pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 152 publications
(349 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether or not such climatic changes similarly impacted exploitation of marine resources along the adjacent mainland coast of Shoalwater Bay, resulting in a similar occupational hiatus at sites, particularly midden deposits, variously between 1000 and 3000 years ago, is a question for future archaeological research. The possibility that mainland sites register such a hiatus is consistent with Ulm's (: 250) documentation of a period of “ephemeral low intensity occupation” between 2000 and 1000 years ago within midden sites of the southern Curtis Coast, located 100 km south of the Keppel Islands.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Whether or not such climatic changes similarly impacted exploitation of marine resources along the adjacent mainland coast of Shoalwater Bay, resulting in a similar occupational hiatus at sites, particularly midden deposits, variously between 1000 and 3000 years ago, is a question for future archaeological research. The possibility that mainland sites register such a hiatus is consistent with Ulm's (: 250) documentation of a period of “ephemeral low intensity occupation” between 2000 and 1000 years ago within midden sites of the southern Curtis Coast, located 100 km south of the Keppel Islands.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Our study complements recent radiocarbon studies by coastal archaeologists in other regions. From the San Juan Islands of the Pacific Northwest (Taylor et al., ) to St. Catherine's Island, Georgia (Thomas, , Thomas et al., ), the southern Curtis Coast of Queensland, Australia (see Ulm, ), the South African Coast (Bateman et al., ; Jerardino, ), coastal Pakistan (Biagi et al., ), the California Channel Islands (Erlandson et al., ), and beyond these studies are a crucial step in understanding past coastal lifeways and settlement strategies and helping define more targeted future research. Despite the growing trend, additional research is needed in other coastal areas as we continue to race against the effects of sea‐level rise and marine erosion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key component of understanding human land use and settlement in coastal regions is comprehensive radiocarbon ( 14 C) dating of archaeological sites to establish a chronology of human occupation. This approach allows documentation of potential spatial and temporal gaps in the archaeological record and evaluation of the relationship between temporal changes and broader environmental and cultural developments (Erlandson & Moss, ; Ulm, ; Thomas, ; Rick et al., ; Taylor et al., ). Because of the dynamic nature of coastal regions and the threats of marine erosion and sea‐level rise on the global archaeological record, radiocarbon dating in coastal and other aquatic regions is also an effective management tool that can help document the antiquity of threatened cultural resources and help better define and prioritize sampling of threatened sites (see Erlandson & Moss, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A decline in the archaeological record, generally indicative of population decline or abandonment, is hard to explain during a period of greater La Niña conditions (and thereby greater resource availability) when ethnographic accounts indicate that hunter‐gatherers would have utilised a wider range of areas and resources, thereby increasing archaeological signatures. However, limited archaeological studies for these time periods do suggest hiatuses in hearth construction (Holdaway et al , 2002), shell mound building (Faulkner, 2008) and changing discard of artefactual material (McNiven, 1992; Ulm, 2006b), in inner New South Wales, western Arnhem Land and southeast Queensland, respectively, between ca. AD 800 and 1300.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%