2002
DOI: 10.1007/s00227-001-0723-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stoichiometry of mesozooplankton in N- and P-limited areas of the Baltic Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, there are no measurements of phytoplankton stoichiometry in the Gulf of Bothnia that could be used to validate the model. Pertola et al (2002) reported an N:P ratio of 21 in the POM from three measurements around midsummer 1999 in the Gulf of Bothnia, which is much lower than the N:P ratios of our modeled phytoplankton. The N:P ratio in POM is, however, also influenced by other factors such as preferential remineralization, the stoichiometry of zooplankton, and aggregating allochthonous DOM.…”
Section: The Importance Of Phytoplankton Stoichiometric Plasticitycontrasting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To our knowledge, there are no measurements of phytoplankton stoichiometry in the Gulf of Bothnia that could be used to validate the model. Pertola et al (2002) reported an N:P ratio of 21 in the POM from three measurements around midsummer 1999 in the Gulf of Bothnia, which is much lower than the N:P ratios of our modeled phytoplankton. The N:P ratio in POM is, however, also influenced by other factors such as preferential remineralization, the stoichiometry of zooplankton, and aggregating allochthonous DOM.…”
Section: The Importance Of Phytoplankton Stoichiometric Plasticitycontrasting
confidence: 75%
“…In the variablestoichiometry approach, the internal C:N and C:P ratios of the phytoplankton reach values several times higher than the Redfield ratio; up to 22 and 550, respectively (Figure 8), contributing to the higher primary production and DIC assimilation than in the FIX experiment. Pertola et al (2002) measured C:N and C:P ratios in POM in the Gulf of Bothnia reaching up to 14 and 338, respectively, suggesting that the phytoplankton internal ratios could deviate far from the Redfield ratios. It is, however, not only the flexible internal ratio of carbon to nutrients that plays an important role for the pCO 2 drawdown in the REF simulation; a substantial part, 26, 37, and 52% of the fixed carbon, is released as extracellular carbohydrates (semilabile DOC) in the Bothnian Sea, the Northern Quark, and the Bothnian Bay, respectively.…”
Section: The Importance Of Phytoplankton Stoichiometric Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Since copepods such as Acartia contain more N than P (Pertola et al 2002), the amount of the former in a given phytoplankton cell might be more important than P in determining food quality for these copepods. The exceptionally high mortality in HD-N def could have been caused by a combined and synergistic effect of crowding (160 Acartia L 21 in HD, compared to 16 Acartia L 21 in LD) and a low N content of food.…”
Section: Npmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the nutritional quality of prey has been increasingly regarded a major factor in prey selection of protists (Verity, 1991;John and Davidson, 2001;Shannon et al, 2007;Siuda and Dam, 2010;Ng et al, 2017). Generally, herbivores have a lower C:N ratio (with a C:N ratio ranging 4-6.3; Koski, 1999;Pertola et al, 2002;Ng et al, 2017) compared to phytoplankton (with a C:N ratio ranging 6-10; Quigg et al, 2003). According to Liebig's law of the minimum, phytoplankton N contents may determine the growth efficiency of the herbivores in terms of C (i.e., the efficiency of herbivores consuming carbon and converting it into biomass; Hessen et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%