1921
DOI: 10.1080/03683621.1921.11513241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stocks for the Stone Fruits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1930
1930
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For most of the plum rootstocks, testing methods were the same as those used to test plum trees in the plum virus survey . However, for three of the less important ('Black Damas C, 'Common Mussel', and 'Pershore'), which were found to be unsuitable as rootstocks because of propagation (Hatton 1921) and suckering (Cunningham 1940) problems, only an observation for PLPV was made. Testing methods for cherry rootstocks were the same as those used to test sweet cherry trees in the cherry virus survey (Wood & Fry 1972).…”
Section: Virus Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For most of the plum rootstocks, testing methods were the same as those used to test plum trees in the plum virus survey . However, for three of the less important ('Black Damas C, 'Common Mussel', and 'Pershore'), which were found to be unsuitable as rootstocks because of propagation (Hatton 1921) and suckering (Cunningham 1940) problems, only an observation for PLPV was made. Testing methods for cherry rootstocks were the same as those used to test sweet cherry trees in the cherry virus survey (Wood & Fry 1972).…”
Section: Virus Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From a commercial fruit tree nursery, and two trees in the MARC collection; (5) 'Common Mussel' was described at EMRS (Hatton 1921) and imported in 1931 (Callaghan 1932;Cunningham 1940) (from the former DSIR Research Orchard at Earnscleugh, Central Otago); (6) 'Common Plum', described at EMRS (Hatton 1921) (believed to have been imported between 1945 and 1950) (MARC collection); (7) 'Marianna', described at EMRS (Hatton 1921) (originated in Texas, United States (Farmer 1955a) and believed to have been imported from East Mailing or from the United States between 1945 and 1950) (MARC collection); (8) 'McVerna', a locally developed rootstock of 'Myrobalan' parentage (MARC collection); (9) 'Myrobalan', this name was given to a cultivar of cherry plum (P. cerasifera) and 'Myrobalan B', one of four (A, B, C, D) selections made at EMRS (Hatton 1921), was imported in 1931 (Callaghan 1932;Cunningham 1940) (MARC collection) (further 'Myrobalan' samples tested were from an old tree of this at MARC, the origin of which is not known, a selection held by the former Horticultural Research Centre of the Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries at Levin, and the 'Myrobalan Late Royal' selection from the MARC collection which was used specifically as a rootstock for apricots); (10) 'Peach/Almond hybrid', a hybrid believed to have been imported from France, and trialled as a rootstock for peaches (Anon. 1964) and as a possible rootstock for apricots and plums (MARC collection); (11) 'Pershore', described at EMRS (Hatton 1921) and imported in 1931 (Callaghan 1932;Cunningham 1940) from the former DSIR Research Orchard at Earnscleugh, Central Otago); and (12) 'St Julien', the rootstock 'St Julien A' was one of four (A, B, C, D) selected at EMRS (Hatton 1921), and is believed to have been imported between 1945 and 1950 (MARC collection) ('St Julien X' is a New Zealand selection made by the late C. Woodhead, DSIR, Auckland (Glucina et al 1992)) (from the former DSIR (now HortResearch) Research Orchard at Havelock North).…”
Section: Rootstocks For Plums Apricots and Peachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, performance of some plum cultivars on different seedling rootstocks of 'Myrobalan' is quite variable (2,10,15,29). By contrast, the clonal selection 'Myrobalan B' (12), which is propagated from hardwood cuttings (11,14), produces uniform trees without the inherent variability of seedlings (7). The performance of several other clonal rootstocks for European plum has been reported (13,28,34).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%