1995
DOI: 10.1177/0256090919950104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stock Market Volatility: Roots and Results

Abstract: Based on measurement of stock market volatility for the period 1935 to 1992, Malay K Roy and Madhusudan Karmakar focus on two key issues : a) What is the average level of volatility and whether it has increased in the current period; b) Whether the present trend of share price movement is likely to impair the development process of our economy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From both the figures it appears that the year 1992 has the highest volatility in the period under study. In fact, this period experienced the highest volatility in the history of the Indian stock market (Roy and Karmakar, 1995) and this coincided with the initial years of liberalization of the Indian economy after a long era of control. What are the possible sources for the time-varying volatility?…”
Section: Volatility Shiftingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…From both the figures it appears that the year 1992 has the highest volatility in the period under study. In fact, this period experienced the highest volatility in the history of the Indian stock market (Roy and Karmakar, 1995) and this coincided with the initial years of liberalization of the Indian economy after a long era of control. What are the possible sources for the time-varying volatility?…”
Section: Volatility Shiftingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is relatively less empirical research on stock return volatility in the emerging markets. In the Indian context, Roy and Karmakar (1995) focused on the measurement of the average level of volatility as the sample standard deviation and examined whether volatility has increased in the early 1990s; Goyal (1995) used conditional volatility estimates as suggested by Schwert (1989) to study the nature and trend of stock return volatility and the impact of carry forward system on the level of volatility; Reddy (1997-98) analysed the effects of market microstructure, e.g., establishment of the National Stock Exchange (NSE) and the introduction of Bombay Stock Exchange Online Trading (BOLT) system on the stock return volatility measured as the sample standard deviation of the closing prices; Kaur (2002) analysed the extent and pattern of stock return volatility during 1990-2000 and examined the effect of company size, day-ofthe-week, and FII investments on volatility measured as the sample standard deviation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have explored this attention-grabbing field and have tried to develop models to capture the volatility at different periods of time to estimate future volatility of stock markets for developed markets as well as emerging economies. In the Indian context, Roy and Karmakar (1995) investigated the heteroskedastic behaviour of the Indian stock market using 'vanilla' GARCH (1, 1) model for a period of about 24 years from January 1980 to June 2003. The study reports that volatility was highest for the year 1992 particularly because of strong economic fundamentals and imperfections in the market.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%