2017
DOI: 10.1111/eufm.12147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stock market integration, cost of equity capital, and corporate investment: Evidence from Brazil

Abstract: We study the effect of stock market integration on the cost of capital and investment, using Brazil as a case study. We show that integration, as proxied by foreign ownership, has a positive impact on the financing side by reducing cost of capital. On the output side, we find that integration increases corporate investment, but only for well‐governed firms. We contribute to the debate on the pros and cons of financial globalization, particularly by providing evidence of important linkages between financial int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
(188 reference statements)
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the regression models suggest that SML significantly reduces cost of capital in the stock markets of EIC. This finding is consistent with the literature including Bekaert and Harvey (2000a), Henry (2000a), Kim and Singal (2000), Huang (2008) and Hillier and Loncan (2019). Furthermore, the literature generally defines the stock markets of EIC as such; poor-quality of information flow, high trading costs, disintermediation and less competition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results of the regression models suggest that SML significantly reduces cost of capital in the stock markets of EIC. This finding is consistent with the literature including Bekaert and Harvey (2000a), Henry (2000a), Kim and Singal (2000), Huang (2008) and Hillier and Loncan (2019). Furthermore, the literature generally defines the stock markets of EIC as such; poor-quality of information flow, high trading costs, disintermediation and less competition.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…We have learned from this literature that foreign institutions, instead of being locusts, actually bring about numerous beneficial effects for invested firms. Foreign institutions, against criticisms, are shown to foster long-term value creation by enhancing capital allocation via investments and innovations (Bena et al, 2017;Luong et al, 2017), improve corporate governance and monitoring (Huang & Zhu, 2015;Aggarwal et al, 2011), lower the cost of equity capital (Hillier & Loncan, 2017), and reduce stocks' liquidity commonality via more transparent corporate policies (Deng et al, 2018).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Models include year and industry fixed effects, and are estimated with heteroskedasticity-robust standard errors. * * * Significant at 0.01 level; * * Significant at 0.05 level; * Significant at 0.1 level.. (Bena et al, 2017;Hillier & Loncan, 2017;Aggarwal et al, 2011). This variable is calculated as dummy, taking the value of 1 if the firm is a constituent of MSCI Emerging Markets Index, and zero otherwise, tracking both additions and deletions over time, being statistically correlated with foreign ownership (0.24, p < 0.01).…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Mmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insights from the financial integration literature suggest that foreign investment exposure may also play a role in channelling the effects of political uncertainty to asset prices. The flow of equity capital to emerging economies render these markets more financially integrated with global capital markets (Hillier & Loncan, 2017). While the process of integration is shown to bring about benefits, in particular increases in stock prices (Chari & Henry, 2004), a crucial determinant of the level of financial integration is institutional quality (Carrieri et al , 2013).…”
Section: Theory and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%