AIAA Scitech 2019 Forum 2019
DOI: 10.2514/6.2019-2218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Shape Optimization via Design-Space Augmented Dimensionality Reduction and RANS Computations

Abstract: The paper presents how to efficiently and effectively solve stochastic shape optimization problems by combing Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equation solvers with designspace augmented dimensionality reduction (ADR). This study has been conducted within the NATO Science and Technology Organization, Applied Vehicle Technology, Task Group AVT-252 "Stochastic Design Optimization for Naval and Aero Military Vehicles." The application pertains to the robust and the reliability-based robust design optimizati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference between exact value of the objective function at the given sample point is computed by the CFD tool and the approximate value of the objective function at the given sample point is predicted by the RBF surrogate model. This RBF surrogate model is constructed with other subset of training set [30]. The constructed model is valid if the difference is small enough.…”
Section: -Construct Surrogate Model By Rbf Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The difference between exact value of the objective function at the given sample point is computed by the CFD tool and the approximate value of the objective function at the given sample point is predicted by the RBF surrogate model. This RBF surrogate model is constructed with other subset of training set [30]. The constructed model is valid if the difference is small enough.…”
Section: -Construct Surrogate Model By Rbf Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization tools consisted of Karhunen-Loève expansion of a free-form deformation, URANS-based CFD simulations, metamodels, and multi-objective particle swarm. Another similar attempt was made by Serani et al [30] that developed a high-fidelity stochastic shape optimization problem. They modified a DTMB5415 model in calm water and wavy condition by combining stochastic shape optimization via design-space assessment approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The proposed method is demonstrated for the hull-form optimisation of the DTMB 5415 model (see Fig. 3), an early and open to public version of the USS Arleigh Burke destroyer DDG 51, extensively used as an international benchmark for shape optimisation problems [23,24]. Table 1 summarises the main characteristics of the hull and test conditions.…”
Section: Test Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 shows the 5.720 m length replica of the DTMB 5415 model, used for towing tank experiments, as seen at CNR-INM [41]. The DTMB 5415 has been also used as a benchmark in NATO STO Task Groups AVT-204 Assess the Ability to Optimize Hull Forms of Sea Vehicles for Best Performance in a Sea Environment [43], AVT-252 Stochastic Design Optimization for Naval and Aero Military Vehicles [44]. Moreover, it was used as a test case in variable-accuracy multi-disciplinary design optimization studies, coupling the hydrodynamic analysis with the rigid body equation of motion through multi-disciplinary analysis [45].…”
Section: Engineering Problem: Ship Design Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%