2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10479-019-03252-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic revision opportunities in Markov decision problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, when the scope is limited to particular types of SAR game, the Theorem is translated to case-specific conditions that may be more applicable and easier to verify. To demonstrate this, we examine in Section 4 two models of two-player games where only one of the players is asynchronous in a manner previously studied by Tsodikovich and Lehrer [2019]. Applying Theorem 1, we obtain concrete and simple conditions on the inter-revision timings for which the asynchronous game is more favorable than the simultaneous-move game (such as Corollary 1).…”
Section: The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Second, when the scope is limited to particular types of SAR game, the Theorem is translated to case-specific conditions that may be more applicable and easier to verify. To demonstrate this, we examine in Section 4 two models of two-player games where only one of the players is asynchronous in a manner previously studied by Tsodikovich and Lehrer [2019]. Applying Theorem 1, we obtain concrete and simple conditions on the inter-revision timings for which the asynchronous game is more favorable than the simultaneous-move game (such as Corollary 1).…”
Section: The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Whenever player 2 cannot revise his action, he is forced to repeat the pure action he chose in the previous stage ("strict-revision process", see Tsodikovich and Lehrer [2019]). We set two different levels of information for players.…”
Section: The Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations