Proceedings of the Fourth ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems 2010
DOI: 10.1145/1827418.1827468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic performance analysis and capacity planning of publish/subscribe systems

Abstract: Publish/subscribe systems are used increasingly often as a communication mechanism in loosely-coupled distributed applications. With their gradual adoption in mission critical areas, it is essential that systems are subjected to a rigorous performance analysis before they are put into production. However, existing approaches to performance modeling and analysis of publish/subscribe systems suffer from many limitations that seriously constrain their practical applicability. In this paper, we present a set of ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing benchmarking studies [1,2,6,7,12,14,15] of publishsubscribe systems are typically strictly limited to eventtriggered notification mechanism, and are inapplicable to determine (ξ, ψ). Prior-art on analytical performance models [7,8,12,13] are typically not useful for runtime performance prediction [12] and also cannot be used to predict performance of periodic time-triggered and event-triggered notification mechanisms in a unified manner. [12] has further proposed a periodic event pull design pattern for event-based systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing benchmarking studies [1,2,6,7,12,14,15] of publishsubscribe systems are typically strictly limited to eventtriggered notification mechanism, and are inapplicable to determine (ξ, ψ). Prior-art on analytical performance models [7,8,12,13] are typically not useful for runtime performance prediction [12] and also cannot be used to predict performance of periodic time-triggered and event-triggered notification mechanisms in a unified manner. [12] has further proposed a periodic event pull design pattern for event-based systems.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have been presented for analyzing and modeling the service latency of event-based systems. They have been mainly focusing on different classes of implementations such as the Publish/Subscribe systems [23,27] and message-oriented middlewares [24,25].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work [18,19] presented analytical models that allow to derive basic performance metrics (such as message forwarding probabilities and message rates) as well as advanced measures derived from the basic ones (such as the utilization of brokers and overlay links as well as the delays introduced by them). However, these models made several simplifying assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these models made several simplifying assumptions. In particular, the models presented in [19] were based on a rather elementary data and filter model for notifications and subscriptions, respectively. Furthermore, only uniform probability distributions were considered, while in [18] several extensions and generalizations were only briefly sketched.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%