2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2018.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic modelling of groundwater flow for hazard assessment along the underground infrastructures in Milan (northern Italy)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The probability distribution of the collected rainfall data has been compared with the theoretical one [43] in order to verify whether, as expected, the data could be represented by a Gaussian distribution (Figure 10b). The slight disagreement between the data and theoretical curve occurs just in the tails of the distribution (representative only of the extreme values) and could be considered acceptable for the purposes of this analysis.…”
Section: Stochastic Analysismentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The probability distribution of the collected rainfall data has been compared with the theoretical one [43] in order to verify whether, as expected, the data could be represented by a Gaussian distribution (Figure 10b). The slight disagreement between the data and theoretical curve occurs just in the tails of the distribution (representative only of the extreme values) and could be considered acceptable for the purposes of this analysis.…”
Section: Stochastic Analysismentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The action of pumping wells close to the areas that mainly experienced the flooding problem could thus be an effective system to keep groundwater levels under control and to avoid the repetition of such a phenomenon. The hydrogeological study and the model runs demonstrated that the reason for the 2014 flooding was mainly due to the concurrence of three causes: (1) the hydrogeological structure of the area recognized as a stagnation zone, (2) the groundwater rising-which has been happening for several years in this area and generally in Lombardy [43,45]-and (3) the abnormal quantity of rainfall that occurred in 2014 (100-years return period).…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…M1 and M2 lines were built at first, with a cut and cover method to avoid interrupting the traffic on the main roads [43]. Built during the groundwater drawdown phase, they were not designed with waterproofing systems [41]. M3 line and the underground railway were built in the 1990s: due to their greater depth, they were designed with waterproofing systems.…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The city of Milan experienced a strong groundwater table rise in the last few decades [40]. As numerical groundwater flow modelling is the primary tool for evaluating the interactions between groundwater and underground infrastructures [34], different 3D models have been realized for the urban area of Milan [41][42][43]. Among the underground infrastructures listed above, all these numerical models focused only on the subway lines: interactions between groundwater and car parks were not evaluated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, when the underground structures are in use, the buoyancy force increases with the rise in water head, and the stability of the structures will be affected. If the groundwater head exceeds the safe level, immeasurable geological disasters will occur to the entire underground structure [15,16]. Therefore, it is necessary to study the potential impacts of increasing regional groundwater heads on the geological environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%