1988
DOI: 10.2307/1241982
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Modeling of Short‐Term Cattle Operations

Abstract: A risk‐neutral stochastic dynamic programming model was used to test the certainty equivalence (CE) property in sequential decisions over a single season in a northeastern Colorado yearling operation. Stochastic rainfall represented risk in forage production, and stochastic steer prices represented marketing risk. Certainty equivalence held when cattle prices were stochastic and risk was increased as cattle sales were postponed. Intensive forage utilization as the grazing season progressed caused CE rejection … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In making optimal decisions under rainfall and price variability, early sales was an important factor in whether the stocker operation was to avoid negative returns. These findings agreed with those of other authors such as Garoian et al (1990), Schroeder and Featherstone (1990), and Rodriguez and Taylor (1988). When all 15 optimal policies were compared, rainfall had more effect on the timing of sales than price.…”
Section: / Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In making optimal decisions under rainfall and price variability, early sales was an important factor in whether the stocker operation was to avoid negative returns. These findings agreed with those of other authors such as Garoian et al (1990), Schroeder and Featherstone (1990), and Rodriguez and Taylor (1988). When all 15 optimal policies were compared, rainfall had more effect on the timing of sales than price.…”
Section: / Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In these type of models, the optimal solution depends on the level of control applied to the system level of production, input costs, and price variability. Fisher (1985), Rodriguez and Taylor (1988). Lambert (19X9), Garoian et al (1990), and Schroeder and Featherstone (1990) incorporated production and price variability into dynamic optimization models.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Dillon and Burley, 1961; Hildreth and Riewe, 1963). Subsequently, more sophisticated models that capture the impact of grazing pressure on rangeland productivity were developed, for instance by Karp and Pope (1984) and Rodriguez and Taylor (1988). Some recent rangeland models encompass both dynamics and stochasticity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often, however, researchers have used a modeling approach to address the issue of production and/or market risk in grazing systems. Examples of studies which have modeled the stocking decision using either bayesian decision analysis, simulation, dynamic programming, or optimal control include White and Eidman (1971), Curl1 (1978), Rodriguez and Taylor (1988), Riechers et al (1989), Huffaker and Wilen (1991), Hart (1989), Tore11 et al (1991), and Carande et al (1995). Given the complexity of grazing systems and the stocking decision, Scarnecchia (1994) suggests that in order to "advance research on the multiple relationships of livestock grazing, computer based analyses.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%