2014 XXXIth URSI General Assembly and Scientific Symposium (URSI GASS) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/ursigass.2014.6929548
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic EMI sources localization based on time domain near-field data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using (29) to eliminateH x andH y in (28), this yields the propagator (19). Similar surface impedance conditions can be derived mutatis mutandis for the other fields components.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using (29) to eliminateH x andH y in (28), this yields the propagator (19). Similar surface impedance conditions can be derived mutatis mutandis for the other fields components.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The latter may be a wire array, for example, driven by voltages radiating partially correlated field components [14]. The knowledge of the ACF within planar surfaces at different distances from the source can be useful to assist source reconstruction methods [28], [29], [30], [31], far-field estimation [32], [33], as well as recently introduced phase-resolved scanning [34] and Emission Source Microscopy (ESM) methods [35]. Furthermore, the method can be used in conjunction with Huygens box method -also in its incomplete version when the radiation is suppressed through some box faces [33] -to augment the information on random field fluctuations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the standard PC normalization a T · a = I, the variables v m lie on an N -dimensional hypersphere. 9 Since N i=1 ρ 2 m i = 1, the projection v m therefore lies on or within a 2-D circle of unit correlations for any pair of PCs. The nearer v m lies to this circle, i.e., the smaller the residual loading 1 − (a 2 m i + a 2 m j ), the more dominant the PCs i and 9 For the alternative normalizations a T · a = λ 2 or λ −2 , the v m lie on an N -dimensional hyperellipsoid with semi-axes λ i or 1/λ i , respectively.…”
Section: G Geometric Representation Of Pc Loadings and Scoresmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Closed-form "analytical-stochastic" characterization [12] typically relies on assumed idealized space-time homogeneity of sources and fields (stationarity in its wide or strict sense), in order to enable estimating ensemble averages of the field from sample spectral or temporal averages (ergodicity) and to characterize correlation by a single function [9]- [11]. Externally generating an ensemble of random excitation signals is usually impossible in circuits, while generating an ensemble of different circuit layouts defies the purpose of evaluating a chosen PCB design.…”
Section: Numerical-stochastic Characterization Of Inhomogeneous Ramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stochastic electromagnetic fields with Gaussian probability distribution can be described completely by the autocorrelation spectrum of each field variable and the cross-correlation spectra of field variables at distinct points of observation [13]- [19]. Characterization of a stochastic electromagnetic field requires the sampling of the EM field in pairs of observation points and the determination of the cross-correlation functions for all pairs of field samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%