2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic discontinuum analysis of unreinforced masonry walls: Lateral capacity and performance assessments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Block-based models represent the actual masonry texture since they are modelled following the unit-by-unit representation. They are computationally demanding and more appropriate for small models and localised analysis [34][35][36][37][38]. Continuum models consider masonry as a deformable continuum material and are suitable for the global modelling of complex geometries involving massive elements.…”
Section: Model Creation: Geometrical Model Generation and Computation...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Block-based models represent the actual masonry texture since they are modelled following the unit-by-unit representation. They are computationally demanding and more appropriate for small models and localised analysis [34][35][36][37][38]. Continuum models consider masonry as a deformable continuum material and are suitable for the global modelling of complex geometries involving massive elements.…”
Section: Model Creation: Geometrical Model Generation and Computation...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, construction technology and masons' skills can influence local failure mechanisms and load-bearing capacity [24,[51][52][53][54]. However, accurately predicting the structural response and addressing all types of failure modes is challenging due to the masonry's inherently nonlinear and scattered material properties [38].…”
Section: Predictive Models For the Assessment Of The Structural Behav...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25][26][27] Concerning IP loads, adequate results were obtained by Miglietta et al 28 and Pulatsu et al, 29 taking as a reference, the quasi-static tests performed by Magenes et al 30 on a full-scale clay brick URM façade. Similarly, D'Altri et al, 31 Smoljanović et al, 32 and Gonen et al 33 simulated analogous prototypes and substructures. At the component level, acceptable agreement among measured OOP response and micro-modeling counterparts was found by various authors, including Bui et al, 34 Malomo et al, 35 and Abdulla et al 36 Limited examples of micro-modeling of earthquake-induced OOP failure of entire URM structural systems have also been presented recently, as discussed in Lourenço and Silva, 37 although either the dimensions 38 or level of detail 39 of the devised models were often purposely decreased to reduce computational expense, which may easily exceed 1 h for each second of simulation time.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In structural earthquake engineering, application of this method is currently limited to unreinforced masonry components 31,32 . Originally developed for solving geotechnical problems, 33 the DEM enables users to effectively predict tensile and shear cracking in concrete through interface spring failures, 34 while crushing is modeled using either contact interfaces 35 or continuum‐based 36 compression softening laws. There is limited previous research on RC simulation using the DEM, with previous efforts dating back more than 30 years ago 37 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%