While a wide range of earth system processes occur at daily and even sub-daily timescales, many global vegetation and other terrestrial dynamics models historically used monthly meteorological forcing, both to reduce computational demand and because global datasets were lacking. Recently, dynamic land surface modeling has moved towards resolving daily and subdaily processes, and global datasets containg daily or sub-daily meteorology have become available. These meteorological datasets, however, cover only the instrumental era of the last ca. 120 years at best, are subject to considerable uncertainty, 5 and represent extremely large data files with associated computational costs of data input/output and file transfer. For periods before the recent past or into the future, global meteorological forcing can be provided by climate model output, but the quality of these data at high temporal resolution is low, particularly for daily precipitation frequency and amount. Here we present GWGEN, a globally applicable statistical weather generator for the temporal downscaling of monthly climatology to daily meteorology. Our weather generator is parameterized using a global meteorological database and simulates daily values of five 10 common variables: minimum and maximum temperature, precipitation, cloud cover, and windspeed. GWGEN is lightweight, modular, and requires a minimal set of monthly mean variables as input. The weather generator may be used in a range of applications, for example, in global vegetation, crop, soil erosion, or hydrological models. While GWGEN does not perform spatially autocorrelated multi-point downscaling of daily weather, this additional functionality could be easily implemented in future versions.
15Geosci. Model Dev. Discuss., also for a wide range of studies on biodiversity and species distribution (e.g., Elith et al., 2006), vegetation trace gas emissions (e.g., Guenther et al., 1995), 5 and even the geographic distribution of human diseases (e.g., Bhatt et al., 2013) Over subsequent years, the global gridded monthly climate datasets were improved (New et al., 1999(New et al., , 2002, developed with very high spatial resolution (Hijmans et al., 2005), and expanded beyond climatological mean climate to cover continuous timeseries over decades (Harris et al., 2014;Mitchell and Jones, 2005;New et al., 2000). The latter was an essential requirement for forcing dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs) (e.g., Sitch et al., 2003). However despite increasing quality, spatial 10 resolution, and temporal extent in these datasets, the basic time step remained monthly, partly for legacy reasons -models had been developed in an earlier era subject to computational limitations and therefore used a monthly timestep for efficiency even if this was no longer strictly a constraint -and partly because of the challenge in developing a global, high-resolution climate dataset with a daily or shorter timestep still presented a major data management challenge.On the other hand, there was increasing awareness that ...