Stochastic Control in Insurance
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-84800-003-2_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stochastic Control in Continuous Time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
147
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
147
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that V (x) = 0 for x < 0. The derivation of (1) follows standard arguments, see Fleming & Soner [11] or Schmidli [17]. If we define ∆ as the death state, the generator of the killed risk reserve (as a part of (1)) is given by…”
Section: Exponential Time Horizonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Note that V (x) = 0 for x < 0. The derivation of (1) follows standard arguments, see Fleming & Soner [11] or Schmidli [17]. If we define ∆ as the death state, the generator of the killed risk reserve (as a part of (1)) is given by…”
Section: Exponential Time Horizonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…using V (x, L) instead of V (x, L)) leads to the original problem without killing, but with the modified discounting factor δ + γ instead of δ. So in this case the effect of a finite random time horizon is just a simple shift of the discounting parameter (the solution to this problem can correspondingly be found in Azcue & Muler [7] and Schmidli [17]).…”
Section: Exponential Time Horizonmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It then follows from [16] that there is an optimal stopping boundary a * > 0 that fully characterises the solution of (5.39) and the stopping set is [a * , ∞) (an expression for a * can be found in Schmidli [43,Theorem 2.53] with the notation m = μ 1 and δ = ρ). We now notice that using Girsanov's theorem and (4.30), we obtain from (4.19) that…”
Section: Proposition 513mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The above is obtained by simplifying the double integrals in the last two terms by using integration by 217 parts again and switching the order of integration using Fubini's Theorem [29]. Recall that F(0) = 0 and 218 F(x − ) = F(x) for x ∈ R, F being absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%