2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6028(01)01392-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STM observation of the 2×3 and c(2×6) structures on Ba/Si(100)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
19
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
19
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We found excellent agreement between our experimental STM data and the simulated STM images obtained based on the structural model initially proposed for the Sr/Si(001) system. We therefore conclude that the periodic 2 × 3 Ba-incorporated phase on Ge(001) is structurally identical to that on Sr/Si(100) [26,27,32] and as such is not consistent with the early models proposed by Du et al [17], Hu et al [19], and Ojima et al [25] Furthermore, comparison of our STM and DFT data enabled us to assign structure of a number of defects observed within regions of Ba-induced 2 × 3 reconstruction. W.K.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We found excellent agreement between our experimental STM data and the simulated STM images obtained based on the structural model initially proposed for the Sr/Si(001) system. We therefore conclude that the periodic 2 × 3 Ba-incorporated phase on Ge(001) is structurally identical to that on Sr/Si(100) [26,27,32] and as such is not consistent with the early models proposed by Du et al [17], Hu et al [19], and Ojima et al [25] Furthermore, comparison of our STM and DFT data enabled us to assign structure of a number of defects observed within regions of Ba-induced 2 × 3 reconstruction. W.K.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 87%
“…Deposition of the Ba or Sr atoms on Si(001) or Ge(001) substrates kept at elevated temperatures (usually above 600 K for Ge and 1000 K for Si) was shown to result in the formation of the incorporated phase [22,[25][26][27][28][29]. This phase is characterized by the adatom induced 2 × 3 surface reconstruction at coverages up to 1/6 ML [28,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4,5,9,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] The key question regarding these phases is whether they are simple alkaline-earth adatom structures or more complex surface alloys. Adatom models 8,28 fail to reproduce STM images of the (3×2) phase, 17,25,27 while alloy models 9,10,25 require significant Si dimer movement to occur at temperatures well below those typically required for mass transport on Si surfaces. A diffraction study on single domain vicinal Si(100) revealed a 90º rotation between the bare Si and Sr-induced (2×1) structures at elevated temperatures that could only be explained by substantial mass transport during growth, and strongly suggesting that cooperative effects between Sr and Si reduce Si self-diffusion barriers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these metal-induced structures, however, several common periodicities can be observed in low-energy electron diffraction ͑LEED͒ irrespective of adsorbed species. In particular, the 2 ϫ 3 periodicity is found to be induced by Ag, 1,2 alkali, [3][4][5][6][7][8] alkaline-earth ͑AEM͒, [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] rare-earth ͑RE͒, [17][18][19][20] and group-III metals [21][22][23][24] on Si͑100͒, and several atomic models have been proposed for these surface phases. In earlier studies, the metal atoms were assumed to reside at specific sites on the intact Si͑100͒2 ϫ 1 surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%