2000
DOI: 10.1002/1520-6378(2001)26:1+<::aid-col15>3.0.co;2-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulus size affects rod influence on tritan chromatic discrimination

Abstract: A signal-detection procedure was used to measure the influence of rods on S-cone-mediated ("tritan") chromatic discrimination in normal trichromatic human observers. Rod influence on discriminability of both increments and decrements in S-cone excitation was assessed by comparing cone-plateau (minimizes rod influence) and dark adapted (maximizes rod influence) conditions. For 1°stim-uli, rods impaired tritan discrimination, especially for Scone decrements. For 8°stimuli, rods had no systematic effects. This co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(10 reference statements)
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That rods impair discrimination along the tritan color axis for normal trichromats (Table 4) has been reported previously (Brown, 1951, Knight et al, 1998, Knight, Buck & Pereverzeva, 2001, Stabell & Stabell, 1977). In our experiments, the effect of the rod impairment is more or less the same for normal trichromats as for tritans, except that the effect of rod impairment starts at the highest level of luminance (92.3 Td) for tritans (c.f Hough, 1968…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…That rods impair discrimination along the tritan color axis for normal trichromats (Table 4) has been reported previously (Brown, 1951, Knight et al, 1998, Knight, Buck & Pereverzeva, 2001, Stabell & Stabell, 1977). In our experiments, the effect of the rod impairment is more or less the same for normal trichromats as for tritans, except that the effect of rod impairment starts at the highest level of luminance (92.3 Td) for tritans (c.f Hough, 1968…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…This is difficult due to the common photophobia of such individuals when exposed to bright light 42 . However, several studies showed that rods impact aspects of color perception at scotopic and mesopic light levels in human trichromats 43 45 , dichromats 46 , and blue cone monochromats 47 (reviewed by Zele and Cao 48 ). This influence of rod signaling on color vision could be used to test for rod contribution to visual perception also under bright light conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to affecting the perceived hue, brightness, and saturation, rod activity can alter cone-mediated chromatic discrimination ( Stabell and Stabell, 1977 ; Nagy and Doyal, 1993 ; Knight et al, 1998 , 2001 ; Cao et al, 2008b ; Shepherd and Wyatt, 2008 ; Volbrecht et al, 2011 ). In comparison to measurements under photopic illumination, chromatic sensitivity measured under mesopic illuminations is differentially altered in the areas of the protan, deutan, and tritan confusion lines, with the greatest sensitivity loss near the tritan axis, but in general, the magnitude of the rod intrusion is small when measured with luminance contrast masking techniques ( Walkey et al, 2001 ).…”
Section: Rod Contributions To Mesopic Color Visionmentioning
confidence: 99%