To investigate how rod signals influence hue perception and how this influence can be incorporated into opponent-color models, we measured the shift of unique-hue loci under dark-adapted conditions compared with cone-plateau conditions. Rod signals produced shifts of all spectral unique hues (blue, green, yellow) but in a pattern that was inconsistent with simple additive combinations of rod and cone inputs in opponent-color models. The shifts are consistent with non-linear models in which rod influence requires non-zero cone signals. Cone-signal strength may modulate or gate rod influence, or rod signals may change the gain of cone pathways.

Rod influence on hue appearance of spectral lights was characterized by comparing the scaling of red, green, yellow, and blue hue sensations for an 8 degrees-diameter, 7 degrees-eccentric test spot under conditions that minimized (cone plateau) and maximized (dark adapted) rod influence at two mesopic light levels (1.5 and 3.0 log scoptic trolands). At the lower light level, the hue-scaling functions showed that rod signals influenced the spectral range and magnitude of all four primary hues. The rod influence could not be characterized as a ubiquitous augmentation or diminution of any hue over the entire spectrum. This constrains models of rod influence on color vision.

We measured the sensitivity, temporal frequency response, latency, and receptive field diameter of rod input to the H1 horizontal cell type in an in vitro preparation of the macaque retina. The H1 cell has both a cone-connected dendritic tree and a long axon-like process that terminates in a rod-connected arbor. We recorded from the H1 cell body where rod signals were distinguished by sensitivity to short wavelength light after dark adaptation. Receptive fields of rod vs. cone mediated responses were coextensive, indicating that the rod signal is transmitted via rod-cone gap junctions. Sensitivity of the H1 cell rod signal was approximately 1 log unit higher than that of the cone signal. Below cone threshold rod signals were temporally low-pass, with a cutoff frequency below 10 Hz. Rod signals became faster and more transient with increasing light levels. We conclude that the H1 cell rod signal is not sensitive in the low scotopic range and, by comparison with the rod signal recorded directly in cones (Schneeweis & Schnapf (1995) Science, 268, 1053-1056), signal transmission across the cone-H1 synapse does not significantly filter the temporal properties of the rod signal.

Pigeons were presented with multiple schedules of alternating 90-sec components. When components in which grain was never presented alternated with components in which grain was presented on a variable-interval schedule, the average rate of responding in the variable-interval components increased, showing overall positive behavioral contrast. Unlike previous reports, this study found that the response rates for all birds increased toward the end of the variable-interval components as training proceeded. This increase in local response rate disappeared when the multiple schedule was composed solely of variable-interval components and reappeared when the variable-interval components were again alternated with extinction. This finding cannot be predicted or explained by recent theories of behavioral contrast based on autoshaping, and thus questions their sufficiency. We suggest that this local response-rate increase results from the predictable change from high to low density of reinforcement at the end of the fixed-duration component. Thus, the present effect apparently illustrates a different type of interaction between components of a multiple schedule than that described by previous theories of contrast. In a given procedure, either or both types of interaction may occur; neither provides a complete account of behavioral contrast.Key words: behavioral contrast, multiple schedules, local response-rate analysis, sequential effects, pigeons When two variable-interval (VI) schedules of grain presentation, which are independent and associated with different stimulus conditions alternate in a multiple schedule, a decrease in the density of reinforcement in one component will usually increase a pigeon's overall rate of key pecking during the unchanged component. This increase in response rate is termed positive behavioral contrast (Reynolds, 1961). Such an increase averaged over the entire component is termed an overall positive contrast effect; an increase in response rate in one portion of the component is termed a local positive contrast effect. Several investigators have shown that overall changes in response rate may be accompanied by particular patterns of local contrast within the component (cf.

Hue-naming was used in conjunction with a probe-flash procedure to determine the time-course of rod-mediated effects on hue appearance across the spectrum. Two types of rod influence on hue are distinguishable on the basis of differences in both spectral specificity and time course of effect: (1) a "faster" rod influence enhances green relative to red and (2) a "slower" rod influence enhances short-wavelength red relative to green and blue relative to yellow. The results show that there are separable rod hue biases that operate over different time courses and that the overall rod influence on hue appearance depends importantly on the temporal properties of the stimuli, presumably because rods interact in different ways with different portions of the neural pathways that mediate human color vision.