2012
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00059.2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulus repetition affects both strength and synchrony of macaque inferior temporal cortical activity

Abstract: Kaliukhovich DA, Vogels R. Stimulus repetition affects both strength and synchrony of macaque inferior temporal cortical activity. J Neurophysiol 107: 3509 -3527, 2012. First published April 4, 2012 doi:10.1152/jn.00059.2012.-Repetition of a visual stimulus reduces the firing rate of macaque inferior temporal (IT) neurons. The neural mechanisms underlying this adaptation or repetition suppression are still unclear. In particular, we do not know how the IT circuit is affected by stimulus repetition. To address… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
37
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
5
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For future studies on gamma-band synchronization, the present results emphasize the importance of proper condition randomization in the experiment design and of taking repetitions into account in the data analysis. A discussion of related studies (22)(23)(24)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36) is provided in SI Discussion and Fig. S8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For future studies on gamma-band synchronization, the present results emphasize the importance of proper condition randomization in the experiment design and of taking repetitions into account in the data analysis. A discussion of related studies (22)(23)(24)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36) is provided in SI Discussion and Fig. S8.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,43). Even in IT, responses demonstrate several types of temporal information that meets or exceeds the information provided from a straight "mean rate response" (5,(44)(45)(46)(47). It would be interesting to explore whether additional information can be obtained in a phase code for any of the many features and classes of stimuli that evoke responses in IT.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On this view, cells fire at rates that are reduced overall with repetition but are more synchronized in their spike times, permitting better propagation of individual spikes throughout the entire processing pathway in both the feed-forward and feedback directions, facilitating earlier responses. There is supporting evidence for this model, both in single-cell recording studies in animals (e.g., Anderson et al, 2008;Brunet et al, 2014;Kaliukhovich & Vogels, 2012;Hansen & Dragoi, 2011;von Stein, Chiang, & Konig, 2000;Wang et al, 2011) and in humans using MEG (magnetoencephalography; Gilbert et al, 2010;Ghuman et al, 2008) and intracranial EEG (electroencephalography; Engell & McCarthy, 2014). Like the facilitation model, though, the synchrony model requires additional mechanisms to explain the basic formation of representations.…”
Section: Synchrony Modelmentioning
confidence: 93%