PsycEXTRA Dataset 1980
DOI: 10.1037/e411012004-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulus determinants of dynamic visual acuity: I. Background and exploratory data.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To obtain a representative range of DVA performance, we exposed subjects to three levels of target angular velocity (60°, 90°, and 120°per sec), two levels of target duration (250 and 400 msec), and two levels of target luminance (35 and 160 cd/m'). The three levels of target velocity bracket the typical velocities employed in this type of work (e.g ., Goodson & Morrison , 1980). The longer duration (400 msec) matches that used in previous work; this duration theoretically permits both an initial saccade and a subsequent smooth-pursuit eye movement (Miller & Ludvigh, 1962).…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To obtain a representative range of DVA performance, we exposed subjects to three levels of target angular velocity (60°, 90°, and 120°per sec), two levels of target duration (250 and 400 msec), and two levels of target luminance (35 and 160 cd/m'). The three levels of target velocity bracket the typical velocities employed in this type of work (e.g ., Goodson & Morrison , 1980). The longer duration (400 msec) matches that used in previous work; this duration theoretically permits both an initial saccade and a subsequent smooth-pursuit eye movement (Miller & Ludvigh, 1962).…”
mentioning
confidence: 56%
“…The practical utility ofDVA assessment is underscored by reference to two basic findings. First , individuals possessing identical static visual acuity as traditionally measured by standard eye charts (e.g ., Snellen letters or Landolt C targets) can vary considerably among themselves on a DVA task (e.g ., Goodson & Morrison, 1980;Ludvigh & Miller, 1958). In other words, a person's ability to resolve high-speed targets is not predictable from his/her static acuity (e.g., Fergenson & Suzansky, 1973).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous experiments have demonstratea that DVA performance may be degraded by limiting the size of the illuminated area surrounding the acuity target (9) and have suggested that the magnitude of this effect is related roughly to the extent to which the illuminated surround is restricted along the dimension of target movement (2). It was suggested in the introduction of this paper that the opposite effect may result when a dark border is placed around the acuity target in an extended field.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larqe individual differences in DVA are observed among subjects whose static visual acuities are similar (1, 2,7,8), and the relative performance among subjects at low target velocities may be reversed at higher velocities (7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation