1988
DOI: 10.1068/p170745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Effects of Target Borders on Dynamic Visual Acuity: Practical and Theoretical Implications

Abstract: The effects of target borders on the ability of observers to resolve moving targets (Landolt Cs) under a range of conditions were examined. Contrary to reported findings with stationary targets, it was predicted that the presence of borders would improve acuity for slow-moving targets because (i) overall stimulus energy is kept relatively constant as target detail varies, and (ii) a low-spatial-frequency component is held constant as target detail varies. In an experiment in which a two-sided border (above and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The velocity of stimuli characters significantly affected the minimal legible size in the present study; as the velocity of the stimulus character increased, so did the minimal legible size. This result was consistent with the findings of previous studies, including those of Long and Johnson, 44 Long and Garvey, 22,45 and Long and Crambert, 32 showing that subjects were able to resolve markedly smaller targets at a lower velocity than at a higher velocity. Additionally, the results of the present experiment were similar to those of Paakkonen and Morgan, 37 who showed that the blur discrimination threshold was a linear function of speed.…”
Section: Velocity Of Stimulussupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The velocity of stimuli characters significantly affected the minimal legible size in the present study; as the velocity of the stimulus character increased, so did the minimal legible size. This result was consistent with the findings of previous studies, including those of Long and Johnson, 44 Long and Garvey, 22,45 and Long and Crambert, 32 showing that subjects were able to resolve markedly smaller targets at a lower velocity than at a higher velocity. Additionally, the results of the present experiment were similar to those of Paakkonen and Morgan, 37 who showed that the blur discrimination threshold was a linear function of speed.…”
Section: Velocity Of Stimulussupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Degradation of colour is not equal for all wavelengths. Red colours (longer wavelengths) are affected more than blue colours (shorter wavelengths) following dark adaption since spectral sensitivity between long-wavelength cones and short-wavelength rods and cones is different (Long and Garvey, 1988).…”
Section: Contrast Sensitivity and Low Luminancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Con la honrosa excepción del profesor Gerald Long (Long et al 1987(Long et al , 1988(Long et al , 1989(Long et al , 1990(Long et al , 1991(Long et al , 1993(Long et al , 1998(Long et al , 2002 de la Universidad de Villanova (Pennsylvania), los trabajos más relevantes fueron desarrollados entre los años 50 y 70. La mayoría de estos estudios se centraron principalmente en determinar las influencias que sobre la AVD presentaban características del estímulo móvil como el tamaño, el contraste, la velocidad angular de desplazamiento y el tiempo de exposición.…”
Section: Concepto Relaciones E Implicacionesunclassified
“…Para decir que un instrumento tiene validez de contenido el diseñador del test debe asegurarse de su relevancia y de que la medición represente el concepto medido. En nuestro caso, el concepto es la agudeza visual dinámica, la importancia de cuya determinación vienen reclamando reiteradamente autores como Long et al (1988Long et al ( , 1998Long et al ( , 2002 .…”
Section: Introduccionunclassified