2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulation of contacts in ventral but not dorsal subthalamic nucleus normalizes response switching in Parkinson's disease

Abstract: Switching between responses is a key executive function known to rely on the frontal cortex and the basal ganglia. Here we aimed to establish with greater anatomical specificity whether such switching could be mediated via different possible frontal–basal-ganglia circuits. Accordingly, we stimulated dorsal vs. ventral contacts of electrodes in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in Parkinson's patients during switching performance, and also studied matched controls. The patients underwent three sessions: once with b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
(83 reference statements)
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Variable effects reported after STN‐DBS may be related to the use of different cognitive tasks in the different published studies, small sample of patients, use of concomitant medication, direct effects produced by the intervention, or the expertise of medical teams. There are several anatomical and functional evidences showing involvement of STN in associative and limbic loops (Greenhouse, Gould, Houser, & Aron, 2013), consequently, precise electrode location is crucial according to the functional nonmotor somatotype of the STN (Campbell et al., 2008; Mikos et al., 2011). PET studies suggested that variability in the effects of STN‐DBS on cognitive performance relates to STN‐DBS‐induced cortical blood flow changes in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the anterior cingulate cortex (Zangaglia et al., 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variable effects reported after STN‐DBS may be related to the use of different cognitive tasks in the different published studies, small sample of patients, use of concomitant medication, direct effects produced by the intervention, or the expertise of medical teams. There are several anatomical and functional evidences showing involvement of STN in associative and limbic loops (Greenhouse, Gould, Houser, & Aron, 2013), consequently, precise electrode location is crucial according to the functional nonmotor somatotype of the STN (Campbell et al., 2008; Mikos et al., 2011). PET studies suggested that variability in the effects of STN‐DBS on cognitive performance relates to STN‐DBS‐induced cortical blood flow changes in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and the anterior cingulate cortex (Zangaglia et al., 2009).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have questioned the fidelity of topographically defined STN subregions by pointing to the diffuse overlap of prefrontal inputs across the STN structure (Keuken et al, 2012). Contributing to this debate are a limited set of pioneering studies in Parkinson’s disease that tested the functional architecture of STN substructures by contrasting behavioral effects of stimulating electrode contacts situated relatively more dorsal or more ventral along the lead wire targeting STN (Greenhouse et al, 2011, 2013; Hershey et al, 2010). While these studies have disclosed dissociable behavioral effects along the dorsal-ventral axis, most have been restricted by the confounding influence of dopaminergic medications in Parkinson’s disease, use of electrodes and stimulation parameters chosen clinically for motor symptom control that inevitably produce large fields of tissue activation, and limited specification of electrode positioning, including electrodes often positioned outside of the STN.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motor impairment is the main clinical feature of PD, but cognitive deficits, particularly those involving mental flexibility, conflict resolution, and executive control (e.g., planning, initiation and monitoring of actions) (Aarsland et al, 2003; Caballol et al, 2007; Dubois and Pillon, 1997; Vandenbossche et al, 2011), are frequently observed in the advanced stages of PD, and can emerge even at the early mild disease stages (Aarsland et al, 2010) and before treatment commences (Cooper et al, 1992). Disturbances of executive functions in PD that involve conflict resolution and task switching (Greenhouse et al, 2013; Obeso et al, 2011) can affect planning and carrying through tasks in daily life (Dirnberger and Jahanshahi, 2013); little is known about their neurofunctional correlates (Aarsland et al 2003; Caballol et al, 2007; Dubois and Pillon, 1997). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%