1984
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1984.tb00897.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stimulated salivary flow rate, pH and lactobacillus and yeast concentrations in non‐smokers and smokers

Abstract: – The effect of smoking habit on flow rate, pH and lactobacillus and yeast counts of paraffin stimulated whole saliva was analyzed in an unmedicated adult population of 462 non‐smokers and 180 smokers. Regular but not immediate smoking was not associated with any significant changes in the salivary flow rate. The pH of stimulated whole saliva was in both sexes lower in smokers than in non‐smokers, the differences between the groups being statistically significant. Smoking did not affect salivary yeast counts,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
0
5

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
18
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, 15-year-olds could be considered as orally 'grown up' regarding their oral sugar clearance, which earlier has been shown concerning their salivary secretion rate [Crossner, 1984b]. The mean stimulated salivary flow rate for the adults in this study was approximately twice as high as in other reports [Heintze et al, 1983;Parvinen, 1984] and 1 ml/min higher than for the 15-year-olds in the present study. In spite of this, the oral sugar clearance was similar in these two test groups, sup porting previous reports that variations within the normal-high stimulated salivary flow levels do not in fluence the oral sugar clearance rate significantly [Swenander Lanke, 1957;Hase and Birkhed, 1988;Spiers and Dean, 1989].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In fact, 15-year-olds could be considered as orally 'grown up' regarding their oral sugar clearance, which earlier has been shown concerning their salivary secretion rate [Crossner, 1984b]. The mean stimulated salivary flow rate for the adults in this study was approximately twice as high as in other reports [Heintze et al, 1983;Parvinen, 1984] and 1 ml/min higher than for the 15-year-olds in the present study. In spite of this, the oral sugar clearance was similar in these two test groups, sup porting previous reports that variations within the normal-high stimulated salivary flow levels do not in fluence the oral sugar clearance rate significantly [Swenander Lanke, 1957;Hase and Birkhed, 1988;Spiers and Dean, 1989].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The biologic plausibility of this finding is supported by the potential negative effects of tobacco use on salivary pH, salivary flow, and oral microbial composition. 32,33 Our finding is consistent with earlier reports. 34,35 However, this association has not always been established in cross-sectional studies.…”
Section: Divaris Et Alsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In one study, an estimate of the fraction of human DNA in DNA extracted from saliva ranged from 11-100% [9]. Two studies have shown increased amounts of specific types of bacteria in saliva of smokers compared to that of nonsmokers [14,15]. A study evaluating the effects of the fraction of human DNA present in DNA extracted from saliva and buccal samples on genotyping using the Affymetrix GeneChip ® Mapping 500K Array suggested that samples containing < 30% human DNA had poor genotyping performance [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%