Stiftungsrecht in der Volksrepublik China: Zwischen Zivilgesellschaft und Überwachungsstaat? Zur neuen Stiftungsverordnung vom 8. März 2004 Stiftungsrecht in der Volksrepublik China: Zwischen Zivilges

Pißler, Knut Benjamin; Hippel, Thomas von

doi:10.1628/003372506775249451

RabelsZ

2006

DOI: 10.1628/003372506775249451

|View full text |Cite

Stiftungsrecht in der Volksrepublik China: Zwischen Zivilgesellschaft und Überwachungsstaat? Zur neuen Stiftungsverordnung vom 8. März 2004 Stiftungsrecht in der Volksrepublik China: Zwischen Zivilges

Knut Benjamin Pißler¹,

Thomas von Hippel²

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2018

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Authoritarian Learning in China's Civil Society Regulations: Towards a Multi-Level Framework

Lang

2018

Journal of Current Chinese Affairs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How do authoritarian governments learn? What kind of events and experiences can lead them to adopt more or less restrictive policies towards social actors? And, how are such lessons from others' experiences integrated into new policies? These questions have been addressed and answered quite differently from various disciplinary perspectives, focusing either on international dynamics such as “authoritarian diffusion” or on domestic policy learning. This article seeks to integrate different perspectives on authoritarian learning by proposing a typological framework of positive and negative learning from three distinct sources: authoritarian peers, democratic countries, and subnational policy experiments. I argue that such a comprehensive framework better accounts for both the relative importance and for the interaction of different kinds of learning in national-level policy processes. To illustrate the framework's added analytical value, I use an exemplary case study of recent legislative changes to China's civil society policy, which have been alternatively interpreted as part of an authoritarian “wave” or as another step in incremental domestic learning processes.

show abstract

Authoritarian Learning in China's Civil Society Regulations: Towards a Multi-Level Framework

Lang

2018

Journal of Current Chinese Affairs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Stiftungsrecht in der Volksrepublik China: Zwischen Zivilgesellschaft und Überwachungsstaat? Zur neuen Stiftungsverordnung vom 8. März 2004 Stiftungsrecht in der Volksrepublik China: Zwischen Zivilges

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Authoritarian Learning in China's Civil Society Regulations: Towards a Multi-Level Framework

Authoritarian Learning in China's Civil Society Regulations: Towards a Multi-Level Framework

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About