Stick to the plan? Culture, interests, multidimensional threats, and Italian defence policy

Abstract

The international context seems to be increasingly exposed to multidimensional and transnational challenges, ranging from irregular migration and piracy to the violation of basic human rights. Rather than excluding a potential role for the military, many European states rely on it to face a complex security scenario. What are the reasons behind this activism? Taking Italy as a case study, this article works out two main arguments (ideational factors and interests relating to the so-called military–industrial complex) and tries to intercept their weight in the national debate leading to the decision to intervene militarily (or not) in Sri Lanka (2004–05), Haiti (2010), and in the Central Mediterranean (2015–). Ultimately, this effort contributes to understanding the role of the military instrument in Italy, a state particularly exposed to the new challenges ahead, and offers tools for research to be potentially applied in other countries that make similar use of armed forces to deal with non-conventional security threats.

Why did Italy contribute to UNIFIL II? An analytical eclectic analysis

“…This literature has considerably expanded in recent years and it has mainly focussed on single theoretical explanations (Cladi and Webber, 2011; Ratti, 2012; Olmastroni, 2014). More recently, other scholars have begun to consider different drivers to provide a more nuanced account of Italian foreign policy (Ceccorulli and Coticchia, 2015, 2017; Tercovich, 2016; Carati and Locatelli, 2017). However, an attempt to use analytical eclecticism is missing 1 .…”