1995
DOI: 10.1016/0168-1591(95)00574-c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereotypies in pregnant sows: indications of influence of the housing system on the patterns expressed by the animals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
1
4

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
16
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, stereotyped behavior (trough licking, floor licking, and vacuum chewing) were more frequent in animals housed in individual cages, corresponding to 42.95% of total observation time, compared to those housed in collective pens (28.64%), probably due to the small space in the former. Similar results have been reported by Vieuille-Thomas et al (1995), andPandorfi et al (2008). The behavior of rooting solid floor in the absence of any substrate (bedding), demonstrating the need to explore the environment in search of food, characterizes a stereotypy and was not observed in the present study since the assessments were performed up to 3 hours after feeding, when the sensation of satiety prevents the expression of this behavior.…”
Section: Skin Temperature (°C)supporting
confidence: 82%
“…In general, stereotyped behavior (trough licking, floor licking, and vacuum chewing) were more frequent in animals housed in individual cages, corresponding to 42.95% of total observation time, compared to those housed in collective pens (28.64%), probably due to the small space in the former. Similar results have been reported by Vieuille-Thomas et al (1995), andPandorfi et al (2008). The behavior of rooting solid floor in the absence of any substrate (bedding), demonstrating the need to explore the environment in search of food, characterizes a stereotypy and was not observed in the present study since the assessments were performed up to 3 hours after feeding, when the sensation of satiety prevents the expression of this behavior.…”
Section: Skin Temperature (°C)supporting
confidence: 82%
“…Previous works [1,9,31] have already provided evidence that IP-housed sows performed more stereotypies than CP-housed sows and that vacuum chewing was the most prevalent stereotypy observed in IP-housed sows. Stereotypies are generally considered to be related to a welfare deficit [12,27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Stereotypic behavior can be defined as "repetitive, invariant behavior patterns with no obvious goal or function" (Mason, 1991(Mason, , p. 1015. Common stereotypic behavioral patterns in domestic swine are often based on oral-nasal activity, such as bar-biting, sham-chewing, drinker-pressing, head-weaving, nose-rubbing, and tongue-rolling (Broom, 1986;Robert, Rushen, & Farmer, 1997;Stolba, Baker, & Wood-Gush, 1983;Vieuille-Thomas, Le Pape, & Signoret, 1995). The addition of substrates such as straw, peat and mushroom compost to swine housing has been shown to decrease common stereotypic behaviors and aggression toward pen mates (Arey, 1993;Beattie et al, 1995;Fraser, Phillips, Thompson, & Tennessen, 1991;Kelly, Bruce, English, Fowler, & Edwards, 2000;Sneddon, Beattie, Walker, & Weatherup, 2001;Wood-Gush & Beilharz, 1983).…”
Section: Swine Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%