2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.tet.2014.12.099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereoselective acetate aldol reactions of α-silyloxy ketones

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…COSY correlations of H 2 -2′ (δ H 2.34)/H 2 -3′ (δ H 3.67), H 2 -3′/H-4′ (δ H 1.67), H-4′/H 3 -5′ (δ H 0.93), and H-4′/H 3 -6′ (δ H 0.90) and HMBC correlations from H 2 -2′ and H-12 (δ H 5.45) to C-1′ (δ C 172.3), along the molecular formula, confirmed the hydroxy substitution at C-3′ (δ C 72.8) in 3 (Figure ). The absolute configuration of C-3′ was determined to be R by comparison of the specific rotations of ( R )-3-hydroxy-4-methylpentanoic acid ([α] D +39.8, CHCl 3 , c 1.0) with ( S )-3-hydroxy-4-methylpentanoic acid ([α] D −25.3, CHCl 3 , c 1.2) and those of 3 ([α] D 25 +62.7, MeCN, c 0.1) with 2 ([α] D 25 +40.7, MeCN, c 0.1), respectively. Additionally, the specific rotation of the 3-hydroxy-4-methylpentanoic acid subunit in 3 ([α] D 25 +2.1, CHCl 3 , c 0.1) (differences in measured versus literature values likely stem from inaccuracies in the weight of this hydrolysis fragment), determined after hydrolysis and purification by mini-chromatographic column on silica gel (200 mesh, CH 2 Cl 2 /MeOH, 20:1), confirmed the R -configuration for C-3′.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…COSY correlations of H 2 -2′ (δ H 2.34)/H 2 -3′ (δ H 3.67), H 2 -3′/H-4′ (δ H 1.67), H-4′/H 3 -5′ (δ H 0.93), and H-4′/H 3 -6′ (δ H 0.90) and HMBC correlations from H 2 -2′ and H-12 (δ H 5.45) to C-1′ (δ C 172.3), along the molecular formula, confirmed the hydroxy substitution at C-3′ (δ C 72.8) in 3 (Figure ). The absolute configuration of C-3′ was determined to be R by comparison of the specific rotations of ( R )-3-hydroxy-4-methylpentanoic acid ([α] D +39.8, CHCl 3 , c 1.0) with ( S )-3-hydroxy-4-methylpentanoic acid ([α] D −25.3, CHCl 3 , c 1.2) and those of 3 ([α] D 25 +62.7, MeCN, c 0.1) with 2 ([α] D 25 +40.7, MeCN, c 0.1), respectively. Additionally, the specific rotation of the 3-hydroxy-4-methylpentanoic acid subunit in 3 ([α] D 25 +2.1, CHCl 3 , c 0.1) (differences in measured versus literature values likely stem from inaccuracies in the weight of this hydrolysis fragment), determined after hydrolysis and purification by mini-chromatographic column on silica gel (200 mesh, CH 2 Cl 2 /MeOH, 20:1), confirmed the R -configuration for C-3′.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative configuration of 3 was identical to that of 2 in the comparison of their chemical shifts, the coupling constant of H-12, NOESY correlations (Figure 3), and CD spectra (Figure 4) [4,11]. The 3 R configuration was determined by comparing the specific rotations of (S)-3-hydroxy-4-methylpentanoic acid ([α] D −25.3, CHCl 3 , c 1.2) [13] with (R)-3-hydroxy-4-methylpentanoic acid ([α] D +39.8, CHCl 3 , c 1.0) [14,15] (δH 0.93) and HMBC correlations from H2-2′a and H-12 (δH 4.85) to C-1′ (δC 172.9) (Figure 2), along the molecular formula and 13 C NMR chemical shift of C-3′ (δC 72.7). The relative configuration of 3 was identical to that of 2 in the comparison of their chemical shifts, the coupling constant of H-12, NOESY correlations (Figure 3), and CD spectra (Figure 4) [4,11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relative configuration of 3 was identical to that of 2 in the comparison of their chemical shifts, the coupling constant of H-12, NOESY correlations (Figure 3), and CD spectra (Figure 4) [4,11]. The 3′R configuration was determined by comparing the specific rotations of (S)-3hydroxy-4-methylpentanoic acid ([α] D −25.3, CHCl3, c 1.2) [13] with (R)-3-hydroxy-4methylpentanoic acid ([α] D +39.8, CHCl3, c 1.0) [14,15] Phyllofenone I ( 4) was also isolated as a white powder, and its molecular formula was determined as C31H50O4 based on HRESIMS data (Table 2); it was 16 amu larger than that of 1. The IR spectrum indicated the presence of hydroxy (3535 cm −1 ) and carbonyl (1729 cm −1 ) groups [16].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attribution of 1 H spectrum is detailed on Figure . 1 H and C NMR chemical shifts are displayed in Table and compared with those of similar aldehydes from the literature …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%