2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2015.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereo-Encephalography Versus Subdural Electrodes for Seizure Localization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…5,11,12 Although MRgLITT is a promising approach to the treatment of MTLE, it is still a relatively new procedure. [19][20][21][22] The likelihood of achieving seizure freedom with SLAH in this challenging patient population remains largely unknown. Oneyear seizure freedom rates have been reported in fewer than 50 patients, [2][3][4][5][6]13 and it will be several years before the results of the Stereotactic Laser Ablation for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (SLATE) trial-an ongoing, large prospective cohort study-are available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5,11,12 Although MRgLITT is a promising approach to the treatment of MTLE, it is still a relatively new procedure. [19][20][21][22] The likelihood of achieving seizure freedom with SLAH in this challenging patient population remains largely unknown. Oneyear seizure freedom rates have been reported in fewer than 50 patients, [2][3][4][5][6]13 and it will be several years before the results of the Stereotactic Laser Ablation for Temporal Lobe Epilepsy (SLATE) trial-an ongoing, large prospective cohort study-are available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with invasive monitoring and the growth of robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG), the seizure-onset zone can often be localized to the mesial temporal lobe structures. [19][20][21][22] The likelihood of achieving seizure freedom with SLAH in this challenging patient population remains largely unknown.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in many cases, such as non-lesional or extratemporal lobe epilepsy, scalp EEG recording is not adequate for localising epileptogenic foci and additional invasive telemetry methods are necessary ( Duncan, 2011 ). This may be accomplished with implantation of subdural electrode mats on the exposed surface of the brain (electrocorticography (ECoG)) or insertion of depth electrodes into a lesion or the brain parenchyma (stereoencephalography) ( Podkorytova et al, 2016 ). Distinctive ictal and/or interictal discharges, such as spikes, sharp waves and spike-and-wave discharges (SWDs), may be evident in these recordings ( Nair, 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These arrays record primarily from the cortical surface, poorly resolving deeper brain structures that can generate seizures, such as the cingulate gyrus and insula. Stereotaxic electroencephalography (SEEG) utilizes arrays of stereotaxically placed, penetrating depth electrodes to map seizures throughout the cortex, offering a less invasive alternative to ECoG that can record from deeper structures (Lang et al 2016;Podkorytova et al 2016). Although the resolution of SEEG electrodes is higher than for ECoG, with typical interelectrode spacing of 3.5 mm (Narizzano et al 2017), both recording methods can miss important epileptic activity occurring in the cortex on a submillimeter scale (Schevon et al 2010;Stead et al 2010;Viventi et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%