2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.seizure.2019.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereo-EEG exploration in a case of eating epilepsy with cutlery-induced seizures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the predominance of non-lesional epilepsy has been reported in eating reflex epilepsy 8 , it has been previously suggested that structural changes, by acting as a switch between physiological and abnormal brain activity rendering the brain more susceptible to focal reflex seizures; accordingly, eating reflex seizures have also been reported in focal epilepsies of structural origin, such as cortical malformations or hypoxic cerebral lesions 23 , 33 35 . Our results correspond to this theory: in patients with no food intake-associated seizures the rate of non-lesional epilepsy was 36.2%, while in those where 50–89% of the seizures were food intake associated, only 25% were be MRI negative (Table 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the predominance of non-lesional epilepsy has been reported in eating reflex epilepsy 8 , it has been previously suggested that structural changes, by acting as a switch between physiological and abnormal brain activity rendering the brain more susceptible to focal reflex seizures; accordingly, eating reflex seizures have also been reported in focal epilepsies of structural origin, such as cortical malformations or hypoxic cerebral lesions 23 , 33 35 . Our results correspond to this theory: in patients with no food intake-associated seizures the rate of non-lesional epilepsy was 36.2%, while in those where 50–89% of the seizures were food intake associated, only 25% were be MRI negative (Table 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%