Digital Avionics Systems Conference 1988
DOI: 10.2514/6.1988-3965
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stereo 3-D and non-stereo presentations of a computer-generated pictorial primary flight display with pathway augmentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Still, in more complex, integrative tasks, the value of these techniques remains to be determined, and some studies have failed to indicate any benefits (e.g., of stereo: Nataupsky and Crittendon, 1988). The current experiment represents an initial look into the potential benefits that such techniques offer to the comprehension of data.…”
Section: Mesh and Rotational Motionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Still, in more complex, integrative tasks, the value of these techniques remains to be determined, and some studies have failed to indicate any benefits (e.g., of stereo: Nataupsky and Crittendon, 1988). The current experiment represents an initial look into the potential benefits that such techniques offer to the comprehension of data.…”
Section: Mesh and Rotational Motionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, the presence of relative motion, attenuates the benefits of stereopsis. This conclusion is supported by studies in more operational environments, which reveal that the greatest gains from stereopsis are observed in more static displays (like air traffic control) than in dynamic ones (like flight path guidance) where relative motion offers a very useful cue (Nataupsky & Crittendon, 1988;Way, 1989). In fact, the very choice of whether to use a 3D rendering, rather than orthographic 2D projections has a cost associated with ambiguity of position along the line of sight, and with the distortion of distance judgments along axes that are drawn in perspective (i.e., not parallel to the viewing plane).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…The application of stereo technology has also been investigated for years within the flight display community.1-7 These efforts have been particularly intense for helmet-mounted heads-up display applications, as the display of stereopsis cuing information is readily available with binocular helmet systems. 1-4, Additional investigations utilizing electronic shutters or polarized filters, rather than helmet optics, to present separate left-and right-eye views in heads-down applications have also been conducted58 [7][8][9][10][11] While most of these efforts have been effective in the application of stereopsis to particular tasks, a program addressing stereo 3-D pictorial displays from a comprehensive standpoint has not been evident. NASA Langley Research Center initiated such a program in 1988.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%