1980
DOI: 10.1021/ja00532a008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stepwise bond dissociation energies in sulfur hexafluoride

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
58
0
1

Year Published

1985
1985
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
10
58
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our value confirms the conclusions of Tsang and Herron 29 that the value of the SF 5 -F BDE is higher than that determined by Zare and coworkers 26,27 and that the reaction of Sr + SF 5 f SrF + SF 4 may play a role. Our predicted value for the exothermicity of this reaction is -89.9 ( 4 kcal/mol at 298 K (using experimental values 14 for the heats of formation of Sr and SrF), consistent with the maximum observed in the chemiluminescence corresponding to 87.2 kcal/mol.…”
Section: Douglas-kroll-hess(dkh)hamiltonianforsomemolecules 51-53supporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our value confirms the conclusions of Tsang and Herron 29 that the value of the SF 5 -F BDE is higher than that determined by Zare and coworkers 26,27 and that the reaction of Sr + SF 5 f SrF + SF 4 may play a role. Our predicted value for the exothermicity of this reaction is -89.9 ( 4 kcal/mol at 298 K (using experimental values 14 for the heats of formation of Sr and SrF), consistent with the maximum observed in the chemiluminescence corresponding to 87.2 kcal/mol.…”
Section: Douglas-kroll-hess(dkh)hamiltonianforsomemolecules 51-53supporting
confidence: 92%
“…[3][4][5] The conventional value for ⌬ f H 298°͑ SF 5 ͒ is Ϫ912.5Ϯ13.4 kJ/mol, 4 and is based primarily upon the upper bound D 0°͑ SF 5 -F͒р381.2Ϯ13.4 kJ/mol determined from studies of the chemiluminescence resulting from reactions between metastable metal atoms ͑Ca* and Sr*͒ and SF 6 ͓reaction ͑2͔͒ and using D 0°͑ Sr-F͒ϭ535.6Ϯ8.4 kJ/mol and D 0°͑ Ca-F͒ ϭ531.8Ϯ8.4 kJ/mol, 27,39 M*͑ 3 P ͒ϩSF 6 →MF*ϩSF 5 . ͑2͒…”
Section: G Bond Energy D(sf 5 -F)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of the newer papers 5,6 have noted that different results were obtained using calcium atoms and strontium atoms. 27 No explanations have been offered for this apparent inconsistency. There is also the suggestion 5 that some of the chemiluminescence arose from secondary chemistry such as reaction ͑3͒, involving ground SrϩSF 5 →SrFϩSF 4 ͑3͒ state metal atoms.…”
Section: G Bond Energy D(sf 5 -F)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At electric field-to-gas density ratios, ElIN, close to the critical value where a growth in the net ionization of the gas becomes possible, the mean electron energies in an SF 6 discharge are theoretically estimated [48][49][50] to be between 5 and 10 eV. Thus from a consideration of the known ionization, attachment, and bond dissociation energies [51][52][53][54][55][56] of SF 6 , the initial step in the decomposition is presumed to involve the energetically favorable electron impact dissociation processes leading to various ion and neutral fragments, e-g., e +SF 6 -SF +(6-x)F, x<5.…”
Section: Possible Mechanisms For Oxyfluoride Formationmentioning
confidence: 99%