2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steps towards sustainable manufacturing through modelling material, energy and waste flows

Abstract: A sustainable society cannot be realised without more efficient approaches and technologies which must in part be provided by manufacturing. Available literature covers the principles for making manufacturing more sustainable, but there is little, if any, practical guidance to show how to apply these principles. Lower level guidelines are required to provide guidance on systematically analysing manufacturing facilities and to assist with the identification and selection of improvement opportunities. This paper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
78
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Environmental capabilities and the associated indicators [10,32,33,36,37] are broadly grouped within three management categories, including resources (energy, water, and material), emissions (waste and greenhouse gas emissions), and environment (e.g., ISO 14001 standards). These are the key elements that to some extent have also been considered by similar studies in these areas, e.g., Material; Energy; and Waste, MEW, used by Smith and Ball [38]. These eight clusters were grouped into three broader areas of sustainable manufacturing; resource management, emissions management, and improved management practices (in order to introduce environmental sustainability).…”
Section: Sustainable Manufacturing Capability Assessment Tool (Cmat)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Environmental capabilities and the associated indicators [10,32,33,36,37] are broadly grouped within three management categories, including resources (energy, water, and material), emissions (waste and greenhouse gas emissions), and environment (e.g., ISO 14001 standards). These are the key elements that to some extent have also been considered by similar studies in these areas, e.g., Material; Energy; and Waste, MEW, used by Smith and Ball [38]. These eight clusters were grouped into three broader areas of sustainable manufacturing; resource management, emissions management, and improved management practices (in order to introduce environmental sustainability).…”
Section: Sustainable Manufacturing Capability Assessment Tool (Cmat)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Suggested energy management hierarchies for sustainability purposes have usually integrated carbon and energy-related capability, e.g., [41] also used by Smith and Ball [38], as energy can often serve as a proxy for carbon emissions, particularly for fossil-based energy systems. In fact, although some capabilities relating to -carbon emissions‖ and -energy efficiency‖ are connected, good capabilities in one cluster do not necessarily mean good capabilities in other clusters.…”
Section: Integration Of Energy Efficiency and Carbon Emission Clustersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It acts as a bench mark for continuous actives [4]. Process mapping is one of the efficient and convenient way to capture and draft the data related to waste mapping.…”
Section: Machinerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these presented strategies will not directly lead to sustainable practices, as the system is not yet ready for radical change. Smith and Ball [44] developed guidelines for material, energy-and-waste process flow modelling to support the pursuit of sustainable manufacturing. In the context of sustainable manufacturing, Ball et al [45] examined the concept of zero carbon manufacturing as a constituent element of sustainable manufacturing, which focused on the tactical and operational levels of an organization.…”
Section: Sustainable Manufacturementioning
confidence: 99%