2007
DOI: 10.1097/hco.0b013e328014670a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stentless valves for aortic valve replacement: where do we stand?

Abstract: Improvement of stented valves has significantly reduced the hemodynamic differences between them and their stentless counterpart. Patients with small aortic annulus, however, should benefit from a stentless valve due to the better expected gradients and lower risk of patient-prosthesis mismatch. Midterm results suggest equivalent durability and survival for both prosthesis types but additional and longer-term trials are necessary to confirm these results.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of new stented valves has significantly reduced the haemodynamic differences between them and their stentless counterparts except for patients with small aortic annulus [8,9]. Theoretically, the absence of a stent should provide more space available for blood flow and result in lower transvalvular gradients and larger effective orifice areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The development of new stented valves has significantly reduced the haemodynamic differences between them and their stentless counterparts except for patients with small aortic annulus [8,9]. Theoretically, the absence of a stent should provide more space available for blood flow and result in lower transvalvular gradients and larger effective orifice areas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As aortic valve prosthesis design has evolved, the development of new stented valves has significantly reduced the hemodynamic differences between them and their stentless counterparts, except for patients with a small aortic annulus. 7,8 This is of extreme importance when calcific aortic valve stenosis with a small annulus, which is prevalent in the elderly, is taken into consideration, because this population is at higher risk for patient-prosthesis mismatch. The Freedom SOLO bioprosthesis is a pericardial stentless valve with a design and implantation technique that make it an ideal choice for AVR in this population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, whether these hemodynamic advantages translate into reduced postoperative morbi-mortality and improve late survival still remains controversial [22]. Nevertheless, these putative advantages have also prompted the use of stentless bioprostheses for the construction of composite valved conduits for bioprosthetic replacement of the ascending aorta.…”
Section: Composite Valved Conduit Using a Stentless Bioprosthesismentioning
confidence: 99%