2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-017-5720-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stent migration following endoscopic suture fixation of esophageal self-expandable metal stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Endoscopic suture fixation of covered esophageal SEMS appears to reduce stent migration when compared to published rates of non-anchored SEMS. However, SEMS migration still occurs in approximately 1 out of 6 cases despite excellent immediate technical success and low risk of suture-related adverse events.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
49
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another promising method of anchoring is endoscopic suturing with the novel, FDA-approved, endoscopic suturing device [ 78 ]. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to analyze retrospective case series ( n = 14), investigating endoscopic suture fixation of esophageal covered SEMS [ 79 •]. Results from some case series look promising, but pooled data analysis revealed that stent migration occurred in still 1 of 6 patients after suture fixation.…”
Section: Utilization and Limitations Of Esophageal Stentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another promising method of anchoring is endoscopic suturing with the novel, FDA-approved, endoscopic suturing device [ 78 ]. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to analyze retrospective case series ( n = 14), investigating endoscopic suture fixation of esophageal covered SEMS [ 79 •]. Results from some case series look promising, but pooled data analysis revealed that stent migration occurred in still 1 of 6 patients after suture fixation.…”
Section: Utilization and Limitations Of Esophageal Stentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assembling studies from 2011 to 2016, Law et al conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on use of stent suturing in the esophagus, totaling 14 studies and 212 patients. Pooled technical success rate of stent placement and fixation was high at 96.7% (I 2 = 0%) and migration rate was 15.9% (95% confidence interval 11.4-21.6%; I 2 = 0), markedly lower than reported values of esophageal stent migration rates without suturing in the literature [11].…”
Section: Suturingmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Sutures that target the proximal flange of a stent are typically delivered through a repeated sequence of mucosa-stent-mucosa pattern, often in an interrupted fashion, with the goal of reaching the muscularis propria of esophageal tissue. Notably, sutures should be placed loosely to accommodate the ebb and flow of peristaltic contractions, lest over-tightened sutures result in increased tissue pressure and necrosis, prompting subsequent suture failure [11].…”
Section: Suturingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 Different anchoring methods have been described (clips, suturing devices, over-the-scope clips and Shim technique 2 ), because of high migration rates (4-36%). 3,4 However, not all cases are candidates, mostly in "difficult" cases where enteral feeding is needed. 5 We report the use of the nasojejunalstent technique (NJST) to prevent migration of FCSEMS in three difficult cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%