2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tige.2020.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving stent efficiency by understanding stent-related adverse events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 61 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent review on the matter proposed a management algorithm, in which single oesophageal stents are initial management of choice, with the exception of cases where stenting was deemed high risk of critical airway obstruction or for fistulas located at the proximal/mid oesophagus [6]. Oesophageal stent carries known risks of migration, extrinsic airway compression, bleeding, and perforation [7]. Whilst use of single airway stents may have fewer catastrophic complications, the rate of closure of fistula is reported at 71%, and the durability of single metal airway stents has been called into question with a 12% incidence of metal fatigue resulting in stent fracture [8, 9].…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent review on the matter proposed a management algorithm, in which single oesophageal stents are initial management of choice, with the exception of cases where stenting was deemed high risk of critical airway obstruction or for fistulas located at the proximal/mid oesophagus [6]. Oesophageal stent carries known risks of migration, extrinsic airway compression, bleeding, and perforation [7]. Whilst use of single airway stents may have fewer catastrophic complications, the rate of closure of fistula is reported at 71%, and the durability of single metal airway stents has been called into question with a 12% incidence of metal fatigue resulting in stent fracture [8, 9].…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%