2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0195-6701(03)00299-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia contamination of nebulizers used to deliver aerosolized therapy to inpatients with cystic fibrosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A retrospective study of tobramycin in two placebo-controlled trials revealed that most S. maltophilia isolates occurred intermittently and were rarely persistent isolates (131); this occasional appearance of S. maltophilia in CF patients has been reported by several studies (76,168,338). As S. maltophilia has been recovered from nebulizers of CF patients (80,157), a small study tested the biofilm-forming abilities of environmental and clinical S. maltophilia isolates after exposure to tobramycin at a concentration (16,000 g/ml) found inside the nebulizers (234). All five biofilm-associated S. maltophilia isolates remained viable after exposure to tobramycin (234).…”
Section: New Treatment Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A retrospective study of tobramycin in two placebo-controlled trials revealed that most S. maltophilia isolates occurred intermittently and were rarely persistent isolates (131); this occasional appearance of S. maltophilia in CF patients has been reported by several studies (76,168,338). As S. maltophilia has been recovered from nebulizers of CF patients (80,157), a small study tested the biofilm-forming abilities of environmental and clinical S. maltophilia isolates after exposure to tobramycin at a concentration (16,000 g/ml) found inside the nebulizers (234). All five biofilm-associated S. maltophilia isolates remained viable after exposure to tobramycin (234).…”
Section: New Treatment Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…S. maltophilia has been identified on the surfaces of materials used in intravenous (i.v.) cannulae, prosthetic devices, dental unit waterlines, and nebulizers (80,157,188,200,228,250).…”
Section: S Maltophilia Was First Isolated In 1943 As Bacterium Bookementioning
confidence: 99%
“…319 Furthermore, S. maltophilia has been recovered from hospital sink drains, faucets, and potable water. 140,320 In general, genotyping analyses have not shown that isolates obtained from the hospital environmental are the same as those recovered from patients, 141,320 and the majority of non-CF patients infected with S. maltophilia had genetically distinct strains. 321 None of 24 S. maltophilia isolates recovered from water, taps, and sinks in patient rooms matched the strains recovered from individuals with CF.…”
Section: Iiid2 Healthcare Sources: Water Surfaces Equipment Airmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…1,7 Bacterial contamination of nebulizers used during hospitalizations has been demonstrated. 320 However, methods of caring for nebulizers in the hospital setting have been widely disparate [424][425][426] and have included changing nebulizers every 2-7 days; changing mouthpieces after each use; and rinsing them with sterile water, drying them, and then placing them in a plastic bag between uses. In the preparation of recommendations for this guideline, discrepancies in published guidelines were noted.…”
Section: Ive2 Healthcare Facilities: Respiratory Therapy Nebulizementioning
confidence: 99%
“…While cognisant that S. maltophilia has been identified in hospital-use devices such as ventilators, humidifiers and nebulizers used to deliver aerosolized therapy to inpatients with cystic fibrosis 5 , as well as hospital tap water and water used for bronchoscope flushing 6 , we are not aware of any previous reports of its isolation from portable home-and hospital-use devices. A detailed review of available guidelines for nebuliser care by O'Malley reported that, against Cystic Fibrosis Foundation guidelines, manufacturers sometimes advised use of tap water as a final step in rinsing respiratory equipment, when sterile water should be used 7 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%