2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rec.2020.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STEMI, primary percutaneous coronary intervention and recovering of life expectancy: insights from the SurviSTEMI study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Radial approach (RA) has been widely adopted in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) [1][2][3][4][5][6]. A growing body of evidence demonstrated the advantage of the RA over the femoral approach (FA) in PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radial approach (RA) has been widely adopted in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) [1][2][3][4][5][6]. A growing body of evidence demonstrated the advantage of the RA over the femoral approach (FA) in PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preferable treatment choice in most of the patients with STEMI has greatly emerged to be the PCI with the implantation of stent. [12][13][14] Drug-eluting stents (DES), in comparison with Bare-Metal Stents (BMS), are known to be associated with reduced stent thrombosis and improved revascularization of the target lesion in the patients with stable coronary artery disease and acute coronary syndromes also including STEMI. 4,15,16 However, there is persistence of safety concerns related to greater risk of late and very late stent thrombosis specially with drug-eluting stents 40-42 and in off-label use, for example in STEMI patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The statistical process comparing the survival rate of patients experiencing premature STEMI with that of the general population of the same sex, age, and region was calculated as reported elsewhere [ 21 , 22 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%