1995
DOI: 10.3109/17453679508995581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stem fracture with the Exeter prosthesis 3 of 27 hips followed for 10 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In 1995, Rokkum reported on a series of 3 stem fractures in a cohort of 27 Exeter hips that were followed over 10 years [2] but this was an analysis of older style stems manufactured between 1983 and 1985. More recently, Yates et al reported on two prosthetic neck fractures, both in obese patients (BMI 33 and 49) who were very active, and with high-offset (44mm) stems [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In 1995, Rokkum reported on a series of 3 stem fractures in a cohort of 27 Exeter hips that were followed over 10 years [2] but this was an analysis of older style stems manufactured between 1983 and 1985. More recently, Yates et al reported on two prosthetic neck fractures, both in obese patients (BMI 33 and 49) who were very active, and with high-offset (44mm) stems [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The modern or Universal Exeter stem was introduced in 1988 with the addition of more sizes and offset options while preserving the original shape and design. [2] The Exeter stem is reported to have excellent long term survival results, and failure due to stem fracture is an extremely rare occurrence. [3,4] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stem fracture dramatically dropped to 0.03% (one in 2968 stems) with this modified stem [1], and reported to be 0.22% in the latest available report [7]. Though, in contrary, a high fracture rate of 11% (three in 27 stems) with this modified stem was reported by Røkkum [8]. However, extensive burnishing on the matte surface due to metal and cement debris production by fretting during stem subsidence, leading to increased osteolysis and subsequent aseptic loosening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Later on, the surface finish was changed to matte, but due to an increasing rate of aseptic loosening, the matte finish was abandoned and changed back to polished finish (Røkkum et al. 1995 , van Doorn 2002). After the introduction of the current Exeter stem concept (made from wrought stainless steel with a polished surface finish) in 1986, hardware fractures have been very rare (Røkkum et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%