2001
DOI: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stem cell transplantation for chronic lymphocytic leukemia: different outcome after autologous and allogeneic transplantation and correlation with minimal residual disease status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
77
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
77
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[1][2][3][4] Younger patients with adverse risk factors are therefore candidates for clinical trials exploring hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). 5 Autologous HSCT is feasible and has low treatment-related mortality (TRM), but it is not curative. 6 Myeloablative allogeneic SCT (allo-HSCT) is associated with high TRM and few late relapses in CLL, 7 but is applicable to only a small number of patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] Younger patients with adverse risk factors are therefore candidates for clinical trials exploring hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). 5 Autologous HSCT is feasible and has low treatment-related mortality (TRM), but it is not curative. 6 Myeloablative allogeneic SCT (allo-HSCT) is associated with high TRM and few late relapses in CLL, 7 but is applicable to only a small number of patients.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Autologous HCT may extend survival, but is unlikely to be curative. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] Compelling evidence for a GVL effect in CLL rests on the observation that, even in patients with advanced diseases, long-term remissions can be achieved after allogeneic hematopoietic SCT (HCT). [11][12][13] A major drawback to these studies, which employed conventional full-intensity conditioning (FIC), was high TRM rates (up to 40%), which offset the high complete response rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13] A major drawback to these studies, which employed conventional full-intensity conditioning (FIC), was high TRM rates (up to 40%), which offset the high complete response rates. 5,7,14,15 Recently, reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) HCT has been used to reduce the high rates of TRM associated with FIC. [16][17][18][19] A retrospective analysis comparing RIC with FIC showed a decreased rate of upfront TRM, but an increased rate of relapse in RIC patients, resulting in equivalent 5-year overall survival (OS).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These effective therapies and the known heterogeneity of the disease increased the importance of minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment as a surrogate marker for treatment efficiency in clinical studies. 10,12,[14][15][16][17][18] Currently, immunoglobulin heavy-chain (IgH) PCR assays with allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO) primers are accepted as the most sensitive technique for MRD detection in CLL. 14,17,19,20 Real-time PCR using such ASO primers allows the quantitation of one CLL cell in 10 4 -10 5 cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%