No abstract

No abstract

Adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who are stratified into the standard-risk (SR) group due to the absence of adverse prognostic factors relapse in 40% to 55% of the cases. To identify complementary markers suitable for further treatment stratification in SR ALL, we evaluated the predictive value of minimal residual disease (MRD) and prospectively monitored MRD in 196 strictly defined SR ALL patients at up to 9 time points in the first year of treatment by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Frequency of MRD positivity decreased from 88% during early induction to 13% at week 52. MRD was predictive for relapse at various follow-up time points. Combined MRD information from different time points allowed definition of 3 risk groups (P < .001): 10% of patients with a rapid MRD decline to lower than 10 ؊4 or below detection limit at day 11 and day 24 were classified as low risk and had a 3-year relapse rate (RR) of 0%. A subset of 23% with an MRD of 10 ؊4 or higher until week 16 formed the high-risk group, with a 3-year RR of 94% (95% confidence interval [CI] 83%-100%). The remaining patients whose RR was 47% (31%- 63% IntroductionInvestigation of minimal residual disease (MRD) has been proven to be a valuable tool for predicting outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). [1][2][3][4][5] In contrast, only a few studies have focused on adult ALL, and they were based mostly on patients with heterogeneous risk profiles and different kinds and intensities of treatment. [6][7][8] However, monitoring homogeneous patient cohorts at different time points during therapy might provide additional insight into the nature and clinical relevance of MRD kinetics in adult ALL, which is particularly relevant for the large population of standard-risk (SR) patients without conventional risk factors. Relapses in this patient group occur in about 40% to 55% of cases and cannot be predicted by any known conventional risk factor. [9][10][11] In a number of clinical studies this led to a policy of stem cell transplantation (SCT) in first remission, 12-14 causing overtreatment and additional expenses for those patients who are cured by conventional chemotherapy alone. Therefore, definition of prognostic factors allowing discrimination of SR patients with poor outcome after standard chemotherapy from those with a favorable prognosis is highly warranted. Currently, the most widely used techniques to detect and quantify residual disease in patients with ALL are multiparameter immunophenotypic evaluation of aberrant protein expression 2,3,8 and clone-specific polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of immunoglobulin (Ig) and T-cell receptor (TCR) gene rearrangements. 1,4,5 Such molecular targets can be identified in more than 90% of patients with ALL by the use of various PCR primer sets. Besides its large applicability and high sensitivity, a main advantage of PCR-based assays is the use of DNA as a stable and easy conveyable specimen, which is particularly relevant in large multicenter studies....

PGI NHL are heterogeneous diseases. The number of localized PGL allowed for detailed analyses. Larger studies are needed for stages III and IV and for intestinal NHL. A uniform reporting system for PGI NHL, in terms of definitions and histologic and staging classifications, is needed to facilitate comparison of treatment results.

No abstract

The addition of rituximab to a combination of fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone (FCM) significantly increases the response rate and prolongs survival as compared with FCM alone in patients with relapsed and refractory follicular and mantle cell lymphomas: results of a prospective randomized study of the German Low-Grade Lymphoma Study Group Of 128 evaluable patients, 62 were randomized for FCM and 66 for R-FCM. R-FCM revealed an overall response rate of 79% (33% complete remission [CR], 45% partial remission [PR]) as compared with 58% for FCM alone (13% CR, 45% PR; P ‫؍‬ .01), with similar results in a subgroup analysis of FL (94% vs 70%) and MCL (58% vs 46%). In the total group, the R-FCM arm was significantly superior concerning progression-free survival (PFS; P ‫؍‬ .0381) and overall survival (OS; P ‫؍‬ .0030). In FL PFS was significantly longer in the R-FCM arm (P ‫؍‬ .0139) whereas in MCL a significantly longer OS was observed (P ‫؍‬ .0042). There were no differences in clinically relevant side effects in both study arms. Hence, the addition of rituximab to FCM chemotherapy significantly improves the outcome of relapsed or refractory FL and MCL. (Blood.

In this study involving historical controls, dual targeting of BTK and BCL2 with ibrutinib and venetoclax was consistent with improved outcomes in patients with mantle-cell lymphoma who had been predicted to have poor outcomes with current therapy. (Funded by Janssen and others; AIM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02471391 .).

No abstract