2009
DOI: 10.1002/pbc.22105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stem cell transplant in the treatment of childhood biphenotypic acute leukemia

Abstract: Treatment outcomes in childhood BAL patients differed by immunophenotype and cytogenetics. HSCT did not offer a significantly greater survival advantage compared to chemotherapy. While these data suggest that treatment should be individualized and stratified according to biologic characteristics and prognostic factors in BAL, prospective trial data are still needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
44
2
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(40 reference statements)
2
44
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Two other studies that specifically evaluated pediatric patients used different immunophenotypic diagnostic criteria: Park et al used the EGIL system, stringent than those proposed by the EGIL. 9 While our overall incidence rate is in agreement with the rates in previously published series which included both adult and pediatric patients 6,7 and with the rate in the pediatric series in which the EGIL diagnostic system was used, 10 when we utilized the more stringent, new WHO diagnostic criteria we found an incidence similar to that reported by Rubnitz et al 9 The phenotype distribution in our patients was no different from previously published distributions, with the majority of patients having a B-lymphoid/myeloid phenotype and the T-lymphoid/myeloid phenotype being the next common phenotype. Only two of our patients had a B-lymphoid/T-lymphoid phenotype.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Two other studies that specifically evaluated pediatric patients used different immunophenotypic diagnostic criteria: Park et al used the EGIL system, stringent than those proposed by the EGIL. 9 While our overall incidence rate is in agreement with the rates in previously published series which included both adult and pediatric patients 6,7 and with the rate in the pediatric series in which the EGIL diagnostic system was used, 10 when we utilized the more stringent, new WHO diagnostic criteria we found an incidence similar to that reported by Rubnitz et al 9 The phenotype distribution in our patients was no different from previously published distributions, with the majority of patients having a B-lymphoid/myeloid phenotype and the T-lymphoid/myeloid phenotype being the next common phenotype. Only two of our patients had a B-lymphoid/T-lymphoid phenotype.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This incidence of MLL gene rearrangement in our cohort appears somewhat higher than previously reported, 6,7,10 but is consistent with the incidence found in studies confined to the pediatric age group, 9,10 and may in fact be a reflection of the younger overall populations in these studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 53%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Его распро-страненность среди всех ОЛ не превышает 2-5% [7][8][9]. Тем не менее необходимость выделения данного варианта обосновыва-ется прежде всего неудовлетворительными результатами лечения как цитостатическими препаратами, так и после выполнения трансплантации аллогенных гемопоэтических стволовых клеток [2,[10][11][12][13].…”
Section: терапевтический архив 7 2015unclassified