2000
DOI: 10.1016/s1388-2457(99)00194-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steady-state visual evoked potentials and travelling waves

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
139
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
21
139
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nunez et al 2001). Burkitt et al (2000) analyzed phases of steady-state visual-evoked potentials and observed evoked traveling waves with a velocity ranging from 7 to 11. These estimates, however, were obtained after correcting for cortical folding by using a folding factor of ϳ2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nunez et al 2001). Burkitt et al (2000) analyzed phases of steady-state visual-evoked potentials and observed evoked traveling waves with a velocity ranging from 7 to 11. These estimates, however, were obtained after correcting for cortical folding by using a folding factor of ϳ2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we did not attempt to estimate phase velocities for possible waves with shorter or longer wavelengths than were dictated by our linear electrode arrays. However, other studies of SSVEP using close bipolar electrodes and MEG and have estimated that the bulk of ~10 Hz SSVEP phase velocities along the cortical surface is in the 4 to 12 m/s range (Silberstein, 1995;Nunez, 1995,Burkitt et al, 2000. The difference between these velocity range estimates can be attributed to differences in the analysis methods.…”
Section: Connections To Neocortical Dynamic Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be caused by the intrinsic properties of SSVEP. Some researchers have demonstrated that SSVEP can possess the property of a traveling wave [25], which suggests that the phase of SSVEP between various electrodes may be different. Sometimes, they may be inverse to each other, which results in a strongly negative correlation between SSVEP and ERP.…”
Section: The Modulation On Ssvep By Erp In a Cognitive Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%