1989
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1989)115:1(145)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steady‐State Vibration of Subway‐Soil‐Building System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although recent advancements in computing technology are beginning to allow larger simulations to be undertaken in shorter time periods, such technology was not available for early numerical researchers. Therefore, authors such as [8] used two dimensional finite element method (FEM) models to investigate vibration from subways. Other researchers such as Hanazato et al [9] and Francois et al [10] attempted to combine the advantages of 2D and 3D models through the use of 2.5D models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although recent advancements in computing technology are beginning to allow larger simulations to be undertaken in shorter time periods, such technology was not available for early numerical researchers. Therefore, authors such as [8] used two dimensional finite element method (FEM) models to investigate vibration from subways. Other researchers such as Hanazato et al [9] and Francois et al [10] attempted to combine the advantages of 2D and 3D models through the use of 2.5D models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In component form equation (7) can be rewritten as u(') = u, + u1 and v(') = v, + v1 in which the scalar values of uo, vo, u, and v1 are Similarly the total stress field s(') at any point in the soil medium in terms of (ro, 8,) and (rl ,el) is obtained by substituting equation (6) 1. At the soil-foundation interface r,,…”
Section: Formulation Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical method is a relatively mature method, including the finite difference method, finite element method, infinite element method, and boundary element method [15][16][17][18][19]. The finite element method is most commonly used, and its main advantage is that objects with complex geometries and boundary conditions can be simulated [20][21][22]. To reduce calculation time and eliminate the impact of artificial boundaries, the finite and infinite element methods can be combined, forming a 2.5-dimensional (2.5D) finite element model to simulate the ground vibration responses induced by moving loads [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%