1979
DOI: 10.1002/art.1780220411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steady-state serum salicylate levels in hospitalized patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract: When the total daily drug dose was individualized to produce a steady-state serum salicylate concentration between 20 and 35 mg/dl, clinically acceptable fluctuations of serum concentrations occurred during both twice daily and three times daily administration. In 6 rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving choline magnesium trisalicylate, mean steady-state serum levels were the same, and the ranges of hourly mean concentrations during 8 and 12 hour dosage intervals were 19 to 27 mg/dl and 17 to 30 mg/dl, respec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1990
1990

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on a pharmacokinetic analysis of this phenomenon, Levy & Giacomini (1978) have predicted that adequate plasma salicylate concentrations for anti-inflammatory therapy can be maintained by administering the drug only every 8 or 12 h rather than every 4-6 hours. This prediction has now been confirmed by several groups of investigators with respect to children (Makela, Yrjana & Mattila, 1979;Pachman, Olufs, Procknal & Levy, 1979) and adults (Cassell, Furst, Dromgoole & Paulus, 1979;Bensen, Laskin, Paton, Little & Fam, 1979;Cohen, Thomas & Cohen, 1978). It is important, however, that the large single doses of a salicylate required for a two or three times daily dosage regimen be administered in a form that minimizes gastric irritation.…”
Section: Aspirin Compared With Salicylic Acidmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Based on a pharmacokinetic analysis of this phenomenon, Levy & Giacomini (1978) have predicted that adequate plasma salicylate concentrations for anti-inflammatory therapy can be maintained by administering the drug only every 8 or 12 h rather than every 4-6 hours. This prediction has now been confirmed by several groups of investigators with respect to children (Makela, Yrjana & Mattila, 1979;Pachman, Olufs, Procknal & Levy, 1979) and adults (Cassell, Furst, Dromgoole & Paulus, 1979;Bensen, Laskin, Paton, Little & Fam, 1979;Cohen, Thomas & Cohen, 1978). It is important, however, that the large single doses of a salicylate required for a two or three times daily dosage regimen be administered in a form that minimizes gastric irritation.…”
Section: Aspirin Compared With Salicylic Acidmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…This is a reasonable possibility in principle but seems unlikely in practice. The maximum plasma salicylate concentrations produced by either an 8or a 12-hourly dosing regimen (same daily dose individually adjusted to achieve timed average concentrations of about 23 mg per 100 ml) were 27.9 and 30.8 mg per 100 ml, respectively, in one very well controlled study (Cassell, Furst, Dromgoole & Paulus, 1979). Peak concentration differences between a 6-and 8-hourly dosage regimen are also rather small in the anti-inflammatory dose range (Levy & Giacomini, 1978).…”
Section: Kinetics Ofsalicylate Eliminationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…CMT has been previously shown to be adequately absorbed orally with a mean steady-state serum salicylate concentration of 20.2 mg/ 100 ml after 1.5 gm administered every 12 hours (7). A comparison of every 8-or every 12-hour administration of CMT indicated that giving 2.5 to 4.5 gm/day produced a range of steady-state salicylate concentrations between 19 to 27 mg/100 ml during an 8-hour interval between doses and between 17 and 30 mg/100 ml during a 12-hour interval (8). More recently, no significant differences were found between the absorption and elimination kinetics of aspirin and CMT after single doses (9).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A satisfactorily detailed kinetic profile of salicylates ha<; been available for some time and has allowed the definition of major parameters and guidelines on which monitoring programmes could be based. The few interesting refinements more recently obtained (Makela et aI., 1979;Levy et aI., 1980;Cassell et at., 1979;Day et aI., 1979;Rumble et aI., 1980;Gunsberg et aI., 1980) have not changed the situation substantially. As is always the case, kinetic information is obtained in carefully selected groups of patients over usually short periods of time, where little can be learned on whether and how far large scale application of kinetic knowledge will contribute to clinical efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%