2005
DOI: 10.1080/00393541.2005.11651785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Status of Elementary Art Education: 1997–2004

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of lip service to the arts as a core subject in NCLB, art education in public elementary schools is NOT treated as a core topic (Chapman, 2005).…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of lip service to the arts as a core subject in NCLB, art education in public elementary schools is NOT treated as a core topic (Chapman, 2005).…”
Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Henderson (1999) pointed out that teachers generally avoided the use of drawings because they had difficulties in explaining scientific content through drawings. Chapman (2005) defined drawing as using art in science and found that only 10 % of secondary school teachers were interested in using drawings in their classes. Our study, on the other hand, showed that drawings were frequently used across the units of the curriculum and the schools from which the notebooks were collected.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In learning art and culture, interdisciplinary integration (art, music, dance) should be inevitable, because in school, art, music and dance are integrated in the arts or arts [5,6]. Therefore, the learning strategy should be in synergistic integration.…”
Section: A Conceptual Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%